Darkforum.com - Dark Stories, Dark Art, Poetry, Photography, Debates and Discussions
Home Register FAQ
Go Back   Darkforum.com - Dark Stories, Dark Art, Poetry, Photography, Debates and Discussions > Discussions > Mayhem
Reload this Page Those 16 words a year later! (Bush was right all along!)
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-12-04   #1
Lawson
Darkness Incarnate
 
Lawson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,440
Lawson is an unknown quantity at this point
Credits: 65,081
Those 16 words a year later! (Bush was right all along!)

Those 16 words a year later!
Think the NY Times et al will even talk about this anywhere near page one?????

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Article...le.asp?ID=14176

A New Look at Bush's "16 Words"

The Boston Globe | July 12, 2004

LAST YEAR at this time, the media were in full scandal mode over 16 words that President Bush had spoken nearly six months earlier.

"The British government has learned," Bush had said in his State of the Union address in January, "that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

A furor erupted over that statement when a CIA consultant and ex-diplomat named Joseph Wilson, who had gone to Niger in 2002 to look into the matter, publicly claimed that the charge wasn't true. The White House agreed that the line shouldn't have been in Bush's speech, but far from quelling the uproar, that admission only intensified it.

Within days, Howard Dean was making comparisons to Watergate, a group of left-leaning former intelligence officers were calling for the resignation of Vice President Dick Cheney (who had taken a close interest in the uranium evidence), and the Bush-is-a-liar shrieking reached fever pitch. The Democratic National Committee cut an ad accusing Bush of deliberately lying to the American people. And the press embarked on a classic feeding frenzy, turning loose a tidal wave of coverage on what had been, by any sober estimate, only a very small piece of the administration's case against Saddam.

Upshot: Bush's credibility took a blow, support for the war in Iraq was undermined, and the idea that Saddam's regime had tried to acquire refined uranium in Africa for use in nuclear weapons was dismissed as false.

But what if it was true?

Late last month, the Financial Times reported that, according to European intelligence agencies, Iraq was one of five countries negotiating with smugglers in Niger for the illegal purchase of uranium yellowcake. "These claims support the assertion made in the British government dossier . . . that Iraq sought to buy uranium from an African country," the Financial Times reported in a front-page story on June 27. For some reason, though, the US media showed virtually no interest in that revelation. (One exception: columnist William Safire in The New York Times.)

A few days ago, the Financial Times was back with more news: An independent British commission investigating the government's use of intelligence during the runup to the war in Iraq, the paper reported on Wednesday, "is expected to conclude that Britain's spies were correct to say that Saddam Hussein's regime sought to buy uranium from Niger."

But this, too, has been largely ignored by the American press. Curious, no? Journalists couldn't get enough of this topic when the story line was that Bush and the British had lied. Shouldn't they find it just as riveting when facts point in the other direction?

Here's another fact, this one from a recent book by a one-time US ambassador: In 1999, Saddam's information minister, Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf approached an official of Niger to talk about expanding trade, an approach the official interpreted as a possible attempt to buy uranium. The author of the book? None other than Joseph Wilson -- the man who accused the Bush administration last year of making up an Iraqi interest in uranium from Africa. Now, it seems, he comes close to confirming that interest. Yet except for a single story in The Washington Post, the media have had virtually nothing to say about Wilson's new account. To be sure, none of this proves that Saddam's agents sought uranium for use in nuclear weapons. What it proves is that reasonable people had good reason to believe that that's what Saddam's agents were doing. Just as reasonable people had good reason to believe that Iraq was armed with biological or chemical weapons. Remember: That was the deeply held consensus of the US intelligence community. It was affirmed by Republicans and Democrats, by Americans and Europeans, by the Bush administration and the Clinton administration, and by a unanimous UN Security Council.

Only in the wake of Iraq's liberation has it become fashionable to assert not just that there were no Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, but that only a liar would have said there were. And only now have the media, in their eagerness to discredit Bush, been reluctant to cover stories that prove otherwise.

Intelligence failures are not the same thing as lies. And intelligence failures about Iraqi WMD did not begin with the Bush administration. It is worth recalling that the CIA was way off the mark in its estimates of Saddam's chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons programs before the first Iraq war, too. It turned out then that Saddam was a much more dangerous WMD menace than the experts had realized. This time around, the experts may have overestimated the threat.

But if intelligence mistakes are inevitable, is it better to worry too much about potential threats or to worry too little? Worrying too much -- if that's what happened -- resulted in the toppling of one of the planet's most murderous tyrants. Worrying too little resulted in 9/11.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
is Offline  
Old 07-12-04   #2
thefinalw0rd
SaxophoniusExtraordinaire
 
thefinalw0rd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: To the back of the front of the middle, slightly to the right of the left.
Posts: 5,219
thefinalw0rd is on a distinguished road
Credits: 138,676
Though if you look at what was recently said by Congress, then there were more than a few intelligence mistakes leading up to this. It's a good thing Tenet resigned before Bush had to kick his ass out of there.
__________________
Hey, bread is a good time for me...a-woodle-oo-doo, singing bread is a good time for EVERYbody...
-Homestar Runner
is Offline  
Old 07-12-04   #3
Lawson
Darkness Incarnate
 
Lawson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,440
Lawson is an unknown quantity at this point
Credits: 65,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefinalw0rd
Though if you look at what was recently said by Congress, then there were more than a few intelligence mistakes leading up to this. It's a good thing Tenet resigned before Bush had to kick his ass out of there.

Bush has been exonerated.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
is Offline  
Old 07-13-04   #4
SilentShade
The King Douche
Admin
 
SilentShade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Whispers
Posts: 22,148
SilentShade will become famous soon enoughSilentShade will become famous soon enough
Credits: 804,583
Read the Politics Forum Rules Of Engagement. This thread is now closed.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
S.O.D.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

is Offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Recent Threads
Migration to new servers...
2 Days Ago 02:03
Last post by cg admin
15 Hours Ago 12:13
After I jerk off it's...
2 Weeks Ago 10:50
Last post by Wicked Lady
4 Days Ago 04:16
The moment none of us...
4 Days Ago 04:10
Last post by Wicked Lady
4 Days Ago 04:10
WHat's really fucked up
1 Week Ago 00:15
Last post by Sic Simon
1 Week Ago 00:15
Article 13
2 Weeks Ago 19:09
Last post by Sic Simon
2 Weeks Ago 19:09
What Are you Listening...
03-21-05 06:40
By Cucking Funt
Last post by Sic Simon
2 Weeks Ago 20:19
Online Users: 17
1 members and 16 guests
mc10077moncler
Most users ever online was 1928, 06-09-15 at 18:20.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com

© 2006 - 2016 Dark Forum | About Dark Forum | Advertisers | Investors | Legal | A member of the Crowdgather Forum Community