And I don't give a shit if you got raped in the butt 12 times a day.

On a lighter note, theyre dicounting abortions like crazy over at Abbots what with the incomming illegalization of abortion. Come on down and get yours today!

http://www.tentoseven.com/radio/abortion.mp3

Come on down to Crazy Dave's Crazy Abortion House! Just because Abortion is an emotionally and physically painful heartbreaking experience, doesn't mean your wallet has to suffer too!

Don't forget to take advantage of our Hail Damage specials!

*slaps forehead* Of course...the answer was right in front of us the whole time. All we have to do is neuter all the non-whites and encourage white teens to have sex, and we can solve two problems in one fell swoop.

Wow! youre racist!

Nonsense. I simply want to solve the abortion problem and the adoption problem. More white babies means more adoption, which means less abortion. Less non-white babies means more adoption and less abortion. Oh! And less poverty...that makes three problems. I'm a fucking genius!

And less crime...

how would this be any different than eugenics, but rather than limiting it by race, it'd be limiting it by a financial scale and testing to make sure the people were indeed, qualified to raise a child?

I'm not limiting it by financial scale though. If those barefoot redneck crackers in the Appalachians want to squeeze out pups at an astronomical rate, let 'em. Then we adopt out their kids...and maybe throw them a little monetary kick back so they can upgrade to a double-wide.

I suppose one should allow for a few non-white kids though...just in case Angelina Jolie wants to adopt from within the borders for a change.

Is there really an adoption problem? What with IVF these days and unfit parents? I thought we had trouble with FINDING homes for kids, not a shortage of them.

there's a shortage of healthy white babies to be adopted...

Plenty of unruly white, black, hispanic, and asian teenage foster kids... but who wants them?

Hardly anyone...and that's the problem. Pro-lifers want all these kids to be born, but how many actually want to consider what happens to them after being born? Apparently, for a good many of them, they're simply content to leave that part up to God.

Yeah because youve actually seen starving children in America rright? I hear a lot about them but I have yet to actually SEE any. I seen poor, but poor in the USA is like being rich in many other places. This is the only country where the poor are actually obese... imagine that.

The problem with pro baby killers is that they tend to be a little crazy in the head. Now I am not one to say abortions should all be illegal, up to a certain point they should be legal, but once we're dealing with a baby and not a 1 month old zygote, thats another story. The NARAL leftists and other baby killer supporters seem to want us to be able to kill babies up to 8 months in the womb... nice.

hmm..

what if they did repeal the roe vs wade ruling...it seems i've seen a bit of discussion about this, even usa today posted a map, coloring the states that would go with what ideal...

http://usatoday.com/news/washington/...OE=click-refer

like political preferance, it all comes down to the states...interestingly enough if you look down a little bit, to the scale, it seems that most of the state that would choose to restrict abortion, are coincidently the ones with some of the highest rates of abortion...i'd hate to see their welfare system, especially those that have a high influx of emmigrants.

The highest rates of abortion tend to be in blue states. Blue states I dont think would overturn abortion.

i completely agree with you about partial birth abortions...if the mother's life in danger, there's always cesearean, when planned those are really, quite delightful...and they can be used as a last resort to save both mother, and child...those ones, aren't any fun.

Did you also notice that the states with the highest abortion rates (liberal blue states) tend to have the lowest birth rates as well? While states that are against aboriton have the highest birth rates? Compare it to the fact that bush carried the top 10 most fertile states while Kerry carried the bottom 10 least likely to birth children... ever think that that may explain how the Dems just cant come up with a 51% majority anymore? theyre aborting all thier future votes