Quote:
Originally Posted by theburningbush iam not sure i follow the first paragraph do you mind rephrasing
your right about hope but you statement about faith does not logicaly follow - it should read you have every reason to believe what you have faith in will happen this follows the logical thought process of what you hope happens does not necassarly happen. I also I agree with the statment reworded as such. I do not hope a dollar has economic value but I do have complete faith in the dollar having said value. If I didnt have this faith, in fact if I only hoped that the dollar had value, we would be in alot of trouble.
Have you ever taken any economics classes? |
sure, let me try to rephrase the first paragraph. you say that we have faith in everything since nothing can be proven absolutely (faith implies that you don't have proof. you can't have faith in something you know to be true.) i counter that by saying that you can believe something without absolute proof if you are given a reasonable amount of proof. take evolution for instance. some are satisfied with the amount of proof, and believe it. others are not. nobody should be satisfied with the amount of proof given by christianity - least of all christians. proving christianity is kinda like watching those shows that explain how magic tricks work.
as for the second, thing, you and i are simply inverting what we mean by faith and hope. for me, hope means "it would benefit me but is up to chance" whereas faith means "it may or may not benefit me and is not up to chance". so you can never really have faith in your dollar being worth anything... for one, it can't be bad for you, and it is most certainly up to chance as to how much it's worth. the ice-cream man could steal your dollar, feel generous and give you three popsickles, etc. see what i'm saying? if we assume we are going to get what we pay for while demaning absolute proof of it, we are being faithful. if we content ourself with reasonable proof, we can safely assume the ice-cream man is a normal guy and will give us however many popsickles we pay for. that's hope, since we have aa 'proof' (economics) that it's supposed to be like that.
economics? i'm taking microeconomics next year. i've read some books on the subject, which i must unfortunately admit seems terribly dull. it's a matter of personal opinion, i know, but i'm glad there are people who enjoy doing it so i don't have to.