Thanks guys. Sounds like he's trying to become a martyr...

Ammendment: "...and not in General?"

... the whole thing was "obviously" a forgery anyway!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2001Dec13.html

I do.

If this tape is so implicative of his involvement. Why is there no mention made towards the pentagon crash? Strategically the pentagon is much more important. If I were a terrorist I wouldn't care how many died in the WTO crash, I'd be analyzing the pentagon crash. He also makes no mention of the Plane that crashed further north. What the hell?! I mean they just made him out to be so calculating, yet, he doesn't care about the two other missions? No leader would get that far with an overall success rate of 50%. I'm sick of this invented "proof" of his incrimination.

Why don't they answer some real questions.

Like why the passenger seats the FBI claimed held the terrorists on one of the planes did not match the passenger seats the stuartess described? I'm sorry but I'm still skeptical. I don't claim to know what happened but this still does not prove Bin Laden is guilty. It just seems too much like a possible forgery.

This was originally used in Vietnam, would clear a 200 foot circle of trees to land helicopters in...

....do you honestly think, given the diverse population and languages spoken in the United States, that the government would be crazy enough to broadcast a purposely faulseified translation of the tape before a nationwide audience? Do you think they would risk something that serious? I HIGHLY doubt it...

I've always been one to say that propaganda works in both directions...

I for one am a bit skeptical how these bits of 'evidence' keep showing up implicating something just as the news-watching masses demand it... like how they could barely find a whole corpse in any of the plane wrecks, but they managed to find their passports... or how they found a van with flight manuals and copies of the koran in them nearby right after it happened...

It seems like it took Bush and the gang all of 15 minutes to finger bin Laden for this entire ordeal after 9-11, convenient, seeing as how they've been trying to get him on something since the oklahoma city bombings (which they initially linked him to as well).

It would make sense that a videotape of bin Laden saying "yep, it was me" would just happen to turn up after about 3 months of bombing the shit out of the middle east (which we seem to have been doing fairly regularly for one reason or another this past decade) with no definate answers as to why.

But then again, maybe i'm just cynical.