"Well, someone says 'I want this,' then someone else says 'You can't have it, it's mine." The person who wants it goes off and finds one thats not owned by anyone yet.



"Never heard of a drought? or a bad days hunting?"

Yes I have and a system of ownership will usually stop people from ovewreating the stores they have saved up in the 1st week.



"Are you against it too? If not then that could be a source of conflict."

I am not against a system of ownership, you are though so you can prove it by giving me your valuables. I have no problem with owning them as you clearly do.

I agree with qoji about things such as the fact that superiority is a matter of perception. Even then 2 individuals from diffierent groups will be superior to each other at different things.

It seems like a waste of time discussing which groups of people are superior to other groups of people. It does not help anyone because the differences between groups aren't great enough to actually matter. Plus these stats vary so much on a per individual basis that it does not help us when we are dealing with individuals because there are black people who will be smarter than white people and there are white people who are smarter than black people. In the end it leaves us with nothing that actually matters.. infact it makes us worse off because these discussions give the apes of our generation an excuse to be racist/sexist/groupist.

however, I am wondering what the concept of ownership has to do with anything?

I have been to LA and its suburbs several times. My friend was mugged in Compton by several white guys who stole his jacket and boots and wallet. When he told us about it(( he got very drunk and got seperated from us when he ducked into an alley to piss)) we thought he was lying. I mean shit, it was Compton. But he stuck to his story.

Crime is crime. It is rare that a black man is a serial killer. What does that say??

Oh... and aren't there many different types of African people? Some live in tribes and the others made huge civilizations like the Egyptians.

Who enslaved the jews. LOL. Just a note. Sheesh. if there ever was a downtrodden race of whom always becomes a target for whatever reason it is the jews.

Yes and he was VERY drunk as you said. In court his testimony wouldnt count.

And its rare for a white person to be a serial killer. and we are 70% of the population, there have been black serial killers too by the way. the DC snipers for example. Crime is never just crime. There is method behind it, it doesnt just happen.

The egyptians were arabic semites. Similar to the jews. North Africa has always been Arabic, thats why when you see paintings of Egyptians they usually have golden or olive skin and long hair and thin noses. Egyptians also had nubian (black) slaves. They have paintings and such of that as well. The skulls and remains of the preserved Egyptians had Cacasoid features, big foreheads, long faces, longer nose bridges. weaker chins. They were of course arabic, who are members of the Caucasoid race along with Thier European Cousins.

The Blacks of Kush invented a small society, the Nubians. They even built a few temples, which were of course rip offs of the Egyptians. Thier civilizatio didnt last long though. And most of it was influenced by the Egyptian Arabs in the north.

Tell that to the Palestinians.

You mean the Palestinians who get to move into the land the Isrealis were just forced to abandon? Those Palestinians?

Yes, I know, the Isrealis stole it first. There is no innocent party in Isreal.

Funny, i thought that all the whites that colonized astrailia were the 'white' prisoners and the guards there to make sure they behaved 'whitely'....
you know, working the mines and the fields to provide the homeland with what they wanted...

The storm caused massive devastation in other parts of Louisiana and Mississippi, but you don't see anything close to the level of crime that you have in New Orleans right now. Facts are facts, much of the crime in New Orleans is being caused by inner-city ghetto blacks.

The US media has been reporting that the tourists trapped in New Orleans are being preyed upon. "Tourist" is a media code word for whites. They are trying to cover up the racial aspect of the black on white crime that is going on now in New Orleans.


This is the photo of a victim being carried out of the superdome.

http://www.nydailynews.com/front/sto...p-292636c.html

http://www.thecouriermail.news.com.a...55E954,00.html

http://www.manchesteronline.co.uk/me...w_orleans.html

No, it doesn't. There is absolutely nothing in that article which states that a gene has been identified which causes criminality and is more prevalent in blacks. In fact there's nothing about genes causing criminality at all. Not even an inference.

Sorry Billy, but you need to be more aware of scientific fact, and less reliant on Stormfront-style propaganda and the fake pseudo-science used to confuse and impress rednecks and adolescents.

There are already too many racists who are using the human tragedy in New Orleans as an excuse to advance their political agenda, which is a pretty sick exploitation of the deaths and desperation of the people affected by the disaster, both black and white.

I argued with people like JLB enough times to know that people like you and him will never accept scientific fact when it counters your supremacist fantasies - the cognitive dissonance is clearly something you are struggling with.

I'm also wise enough to know that arguing the point further is a waste of time - you obviously feel psychologically secure in your fortress of logical fallacies, and you certainly won't be tempted to admit the possibility that you're wrong in public - if anything your remarks will probably just get even more defensive (an increase in personal insults etc) than they clearly are at the moment.

But I would advise you to read the article I posted and think through the subject carefully (and I'm sure you can come up with a carefully flippant put-down to this post, playing to the crowd as part of your defensive reaction to avoid having to change your opinion - do that by all means, but at least try to educate yourself).

You're welcome.

The black community does suffer from a high crime rate, but this is a gross exagerration. It destroys your arguement.

Meh... I walked around Compton... not very scary at all..... I also walked around several other suburbs that were supposed to be "dangerous" and found low middle class america the same as any other suburbia.... I saw more punk rockers that night than anyone else.... and lots of hispanics....

I live in a very diverse neighborhood. It is considered to be a high crime area for Seattle, but I don't have any problems.

Great place for authentic Mexican, Thai, and Vietnamese restaurants.

STICK TO THE FACTS, so far no gene has been identified which causes criminality, however this dosn't mean there isn't one, it merely means we havn't found it yet.

Wev'e only just begun to understand our genes and I expect it will still be many years before we can explain via genetic profiling - human behaviour in all it's varieties.

So the fact is we don't know what causes criminality, because the hodge podge sociology theories dont offer a shred of proof either in comparison to empiricism.

Therefore its' better to be safe than sorry! If empirical studies over a ten year period show that blacks commit more crime in a White society, until we have genetic proof to explain this behaviour it's best to keep blacks out of White society.

You have to remember, no-one is advocating persecution or all the other media induced myths you may have of White on black suppression. All people are asking for is that White people get a choice in deciding who they have in their schools, who they have in neighbourhoods, what is shown on the TV, and the type of society.

So far this choice is not available because liberal multi-culti enforcers use federal laws to make sure that White parents cannot send their children to a school where their children will not get mugged by larger black kids.



blah blah blah... you dont offer any facts either to support your arguments. I am willing to bet a thousand dollars, that when you say that both black and Whites are prone to ccommit an equal proportion of crime, that you cannot provide a shred of proof to support this theory.

and in fact I am willing to bet a thousand dollars that if you obtained the crime statistics, that they will show more blacks commit more crime than White per capita in a White society.

However, regardless, multi-culti liberls will still refuse to admit it. Because if someone like Hitler said 1 + 1 = 2, then it's automatically evil, even though he's telling the truth and that is that 1 + 1 does in FACT = 2. What i'm suggesting here is that youv'e been brainwashed so much by the media and skewed education system, that even when plain facts are provided to you, you decide to use 'YOUR OPINION' (which is not fact) and then continue to dismiss the facts to suit your purpose.

FACT IS FACT - BLACKS COMMIT MORE CRIME PER CAPITA THAN WHITES IN A WHITE SOCIETY!

if you have any evidence to suggest the opposite then please post it, i'm willing to listen, but as I said i will bet a thousand dollars you can't.


Society on Hitler - "Hitler murdered 6 million hews therefore he's the most evil person in history!"

Society on Stalin - "Stalin murdered over 50 million Russians, Ukrainins, Poles and others, and yet he's not as evil as Hitler!"

Society on Pol-Pot - "Pol-Pot murdered 3 million of his own people in Cambodia, and yet he's not that evil in comparison to Hitler!"

Society on Chairman Mao - "Chairman Mao murdered 50 million Chinese, and yet he's not as evil as Hitler!"

amazing!!!!

on the hurricane, if you go to Biloxi or other parts of Mississippi you will see just as much devastation caused by the hurricane. However, nobody is wandering around shooting, looting, raping or wailing on about not having any food or water!

FACT IS FACT, those people in New-Orleans were given nealry 48 hours warning that a large category 5 hurricane was heading their way and that they would be advised to evacuate.

As someone posted, it would take 20 hours to walk to Baton Rouge and temporary shelter / help. Apart from the people in hospitals and some elderly people. Everybody else had a chance to get off their arses and to start walking along that highway to safety.

but no, thousands of people decide to stay behind so that tey could loot other people livelihoods and steal the property of other people, or they stayed behind because they were too lazy.

even some black cops were filmed looting a wallmart. they wandered around with a shopping trolly filling it with goods. A Fox news reporter filmed and asked them - "what are you doing!"

to which replied stupidly - "i'm doing my job!" - looting!


did you hear about how a rescue helicopter was trying to rescue people, and someone shot at it!

amazing!!

and yet some liberal multi-culti enforcers are still going to insist that their bad behaviour is somebody elses fault!

amazing!


i'm in a ranting mood this morning. i'm so pissed off because my tax has been squandered grrrrrr!

I have stuck to the facts. Thank you for agreeing with my argument (against Billy) that there is no scientific evidence identifying a gene which causes criminality and is more prevalent in blacks. The rest of your post on that point is off-topic, ill-argued and of no relevance.


I did offer facts - an article I linked to - to prove my claim that there is no scientific evidence identifying a gene which causes criminality and is more prevalent in blacks.

I did not say, or even infer, that "both black and whites are prone to commit an equal proportion of crime". What I did say in my first post on this thread (I think it was on page 10, if you want to check) - was that "I'll believe your statistics".

My one and only point so far has been to argue against Billy's completely unsubstantiated claim that this is due to genetics (a ridiculous claim on his part because there is no scientific evidence identifying a gene which causes criminality and is more prevalent in blacks, and when I asked him to produce some he's tried to cover his inability to do so with bluster and posturing).