Well, that's quite a difference.

I'd have been more convinced if Oazaki had mentioned hair and eye colour (why didn't he guess my breast size? ). With the shape of my eyes, well, I think everyone's eyes are slightly slanted. If I was to give a name to the shape of my eyes, I'd say they were almond shaped. But like I said before it's very difficult for me to be objective about my looks. He was right about my forehead, which is not square. He wasn't very specific about anything but the eyes. He was also close about my lower chakras, according to an online test.

I should post a picture of me beside my father and my grandmother on my mother's side. I'm sure you'd see both of them in my features.

Oazaki, it's kind of hard to believe the more grandiose things you've said when you have such great difficulty just describing people posting over the internet. I mean no disrespect, but you say you've killed a god form and taken control of the Illuminati and you are planning on taking over the world, but you can't tell us what we look like with accuracy, nor can you tell the living from the dead?

What if all you are predicting does come to pass - in your reality. In your reality you rule the world, Bush is dead, yadda yadda. But in our reality? What if in our reality you are sitting in the corner of a padded room, staring at nothing, with a string of drool hanging off your chin?

Not trying to be mean or offend (truly I'm not), but what if? What will you do when/if none of this comes to pass?

I'd love to see a picture of you anyway!

Besides being off about many Spiritual truths, yet at the same time having access to some valid ones, he was completely off about me. He had me living in France to start with. Physically he didn't get me at all, I mean he had two completely polar possibilities, just in case. When he wrote about my chakras he was way off too, and especially since recently a lot of "work" has been related in this sphere of matters specifically for me, which is why I feel a bit sorry for him that he was so completely inaccurate. He pinpointed some basic personality traits which can be easily observed through my posts on DF, which concerns with compassion and empathy towards all living creatures. Basically, he is unfortunately not quite what he wishes to believe he is.

Not knowing whether someone was dead or alive was an enormous indicator as people no longer attached to an incarnate body vibrates on an entirely different frequency than those who still are incarnate.

That's kind of why I've put the 'for the record, I've talked about this on the OF' flags at certain points. I know he still drops in on OF every once in a while, so I don't know that he isn't getting this stuff from there.

It's like with most psychics - if you're vague enough and keep on guessing, eventually you'll hit the mark. (Sorry, Oazaki, but it's true.)

He started talking with me when I asked him if I was hellspawn like PaulS. Oazaki said no, I wasn't involved with hell, but I was merging with a goddess. When I suggested that there was something going on with me but not as he described, he came up with a demon - which is a natural guess considering I am an enthusiastic Satanist/Luciferian. For my part, I grabbed on to the demon because it reminded me of my dark personality. Most likely Oazaki had no idea about it before I said something.

I guess it goes without saying that I don't really take Oazaki seriously. Sorry, man. If something does happen in the next couple of months, that might change. Like I said : I'll believe it when I see it.

It's been fun, though.

The difference between you and I is that I am humble..... I am willing to admit when I am wrong.... you may ask Lillith the truth on that mark.... I am also brutally honest and willing to verbally debate a matter to the death if I know I am right..... which in this case I am.... about you.... you have not a humble bone in your body..... "One must crawl through the pit of darkness in order to gather toward the light!!".... a person must know when it is better to remain silent and think rather than make dubious remarks and guesses.... you are intelligent.... I will grant you that....(notice---honesty---) yet you have no wisdom to temper that intelligence... no patience.... nor respect.....
You make wild claims using astrological guesses..... all throughout history people have been bemoaning the end of the world and great change..... nothing ever changes overnight.... change is gradual.... and astrology is at best a hypothetical guess..... there is no rational thought behind your words... there is no personality.... you merely forward ideals placed by others before you and mix them all about hoping that others will see them as original..... when in truth you do not have an original thought in your body....

Like I said.... the major difference betwen us is that I am humble and can readily admit that I am a fool.... and I do not even take offense at you for pointing out something I have full knowledge of.....

You are a mere boy upon the path of personal spirituality..... you have made the fatal mistake of getting caught up in proving to others that you are something more than you are when in fact you should be working toward proving it to yourself..... in fact you should not even worry about providing proof.... for the only proof you need can be found deep within your own soul.....

I have to echo Xul here...... I forgive you your ignorance.....

Ohhhh... haha.... that is too funny.... I must exclaim upon your amusing task of absorbing all that is told you and throwing it back in a mutated and quite sophomoric way..... you with your supposed "higher existence" should know what I speak of....

Lets pluck another date out of the air.... ohhh.. lets say.....

2021.... it has the numerals (21) in it..... 21 being a very redundant universal number...... something must be happening that year as well.....

Robert Anton Wilson being interviewed by Michael Dare

""After LSD impacted on me, I became a total agnostic, and I'm not dogmatic about anything any more. I know that every system I make up is my own brain making up a system. None of the systems is big enough to include the whole universe, so all of my beliefs are only relatively true. Some are undoubtedly wrong because I'm not that brilliant that I never make a mistake.
There are a lot of people who don't realize how conceited they are. By asserting with such certitude the things they believe in, they don't realize that they're saying "I'm the smartest person in the world, I can answer all the questions." People like Carl Sagan. I just don't know how he can be so sure of everything when, by and large, the more intelligent you get, the more you realize you can't be sure of anything.""

Ohhh hahaha... that is rich.... very rich...

Another wonderful Snippet.... R.A.Wilson has a PHD in Psychology by the by....

""WILSON
You've got to teach with humor to make the pill palatable. Besides, humor is the essence of realizing our true situation in space and time. We are these tiny fallible beings crawling around on a relatively small planet, and anybody who pontificates dogmatically about anything is giving evidence that they are an idiot, even if you agree with them. They shouldn't sound that certain. We think we're so damn smart and we know so ***** little""

I will give you this Oazaki.... you have me rolling about in laughter right now..... I mean belly aching throat burning motherfucking stomach bile laughing.... ohhh hahahahah!!!

...and still you dodge the challenge....is it because you don't want to get into my pants?

Is this whole "I know so much about you" thing just intellectual flirting?
That's what I thought it was from the start but a part of me had hoped for more.....

well indeed, i was wrong about lillith. and indeed i will say that i believed i was right and that i sincerely tried to get an accurate reading on her. but it would appear that i did not. that is not a problem for me. for i have done what i did with her with others and been very correct with my findings. yet with hers i was not. i would wonder why this is.

it is indeed possible that i am wrong in all my stuff. it may also be possible that i am right. for now, you will have to decide that for yourselves. the truth of it all, as i have long maintained, will be evident for all to see as 2004 unfolds.

if 2004 is a fairly uneventful year much like any other then you shall know, as shall i myself, that all my stuff is not right on the money and that i am in all probability delusional and misguided. but if over the course of 2004 bush dies, the poles shift, the very fabric of the universe tears assunder and rains cataclysm after cataclysm on the beast from revelations (america), and america falls, and the zhedhi order rules the world.... well, i think you'll all have to concede that in the eventuality of these things coming to pass that i was right in what i have been saying and you all were wrong. in such an eventuality i do wonder how long it will take for you all to wake up and realise that what i have been saying was right all along and that you all were wrong all along. and did not see to the truth of things because of your own pride, self-delusion, LAZINESS and pig-headedness. will the violent death of george w bush convince you? i think probably not. will anti-government riots in the streets of the USA convince you? still i think you shall doubt and seek to rationalize it and attribute it to causes other than my hand. will the first shifting of the poles convince you? i doubt it. will the opening of the seven seals convince you? of the raining down upon america of plague after plague after plague, of tidal waves, earthquakes such as have never yet been seen nor shall ever be again on this earth, of burning comets falling as rain, of a second sun appearing in the sky, of a large portion of the USA sinking beneath the waves convince you? i think perhaps. and when that comes to pass recall this day and your own inadequacy. and then seek to remedy it. for your time upon the earth will be short if your consciousness is not at the level required to pass the transition.

so we return to lillith. why was i wrong? i, like all humans, do of course prefer life to always be rosy and all to go well with me. yet such is not the nature of creation. for day there must be night, for light there must be dark, for success there must be failure, for correctness there must be wrongness. for every time the wheel doth rise, it must also fall. and, whatever one's abilities, in whatever sphere of life, when it comes to the operation of the laws of creation causing a certain thing your abilities will avail you not. for karma is inviolable and god will not be denied. and i, too, am a part of the creation and subject to its laws.

yet these laws, too, are a part of creation and must be accepted. and so i do accept them. and therefore can i use them. though oft from a level beyond that at which my conscious, earth-bound ego personality operates. for such is how it had to be. and yes, for all the times i was right and for all the times i will be right still, i had to be wrong also. and for all the times i succeeded and for all the times that i will yet succeed i had to fail. yet i do not mind failing or being wrong. provided that i so fail and i am so wrong in an area which is relatively insignificant to me and impacts not upon my design. so thank-you, lillith, for that oppurtunity.

and now we turn to 2004. and the drama begins shortly, very shortly indeed, to unfold. if nothing happens i will admit, fully and freely for all to hear that i was wrong. that is not a problem for me, i have no pride clouding my perception nor do i tie my self-worth to the proven truth or falsity of my belief structure. and i ask once again, and for the last time, if things do begin to happen, will you all admit - to yourselves more than to me, for it is your own being which is important here - that you were wrong? and how long before external events force you to so admit this to yourself? and will you do so before it is too late?

and judgement day fast approaches.

i wish you all the best and know that i have done for you what i could.
Oazaki.

ps lillith: if bush does die in march/april and the death is blamed according to the pattern thus far set (figure it out) and riots in the streets do follow... consider getting out of south africa. fast. for the poles will shift soon thereafter and south africa will not be the best place to be for that. take this as you will for now.

Xul was absolutely right when he pegged you as chameleonic..... when you came here you were convinced that you were right and nothing anyone said could prove you wrong.... you called everyone who responded to you ina negative manner fools and laughed at them... you stated pretty firmly that you were always right and that you were never wrong..... now you all of sudden take an about face and attempt to be humble yet with gritted teeth....

Psychology 101----- when you tell a person about themselves if some of what you tell them feels familiar they will latch onto this and may even believe those things you say about them which are completely off the mark..... this is how astrology, tarot, and other divining knowledges work..... people who want to believe WILL believe....

it is already too late for you to attempt a humble visage.....

I didn't knock any of your predictions (except maybe two suns appearing in the sky..should be two 'sunrises', same sun twice because of polar slip)

I'm knocking your 'observations' of people, or rather your reasons for selecting who to 'observe'

[quote=Dyshade]

Psychology 101----- when you tell a person about themselves if some of what you tell them feels familiar they will latch onto this and may even believe those things you say about them which are completely off the mark..... this is how astrology, tarot, and other divining knowledges work..... people who want to believe WILL believe....
[quote]

Politics too

It's the whole herd mentality, people want to belong to a group yet they want to be recognised as individuals

See why it makes more sense to be a sociopath....

Fair enough Oazaki. If Bush dies a violent death, my views will change, I'll make time to read your library of posts, and I'll be getting the hell out of the U.S. just in case. I'm due for an adventure anyway.

So, with two sunrises - does that mean there will be no night? I can't quite wrap my mind around what the shifting poles would mean. I can't live without night.

It's called the Chandler effect, all the tales about how the world will end (seas tipping from their bowls, not a single rock left on another, two suns) can be explained by the earth slipping on its axis (there is geolocical indications that this has happened before).
If the earth were to slip on it's axis there wuold be tremendous geological and seismic upheavel and it would appear as if the sun suddenly sank below the horizon and flew back up into the sky (depending on your latitude of course )

Oazaki, what do you think of Aaron Donahue's predictions?

Fero, I wouldn't feel left out, he avoids me as well... Well except to say that if I dont change my position I will be in for a world of hurt and it will be my own fault... What a bully.

Lillith, lol. I didn't read all of his discription of you, but the physical apperance was funny. What a sad, sad man.