He was a homicidal artist. He turned killing into art. See kitten, art doesnt have to conform to what you want it to. Some people make pretty paintings, others use human body parts to make bizzarre sculptures.

Would you call singing an artform? How about acting? By your definition they arent because they are not paintings or anything in the box. If they are, then murder can be art too.

If killing should be classified as an art and killing is a crime then artists should go to jail. Sorry Michelangelo, you were a bad boy and it's time you pay your dues, there's a new definition of art in town and it's a crime.

Nice straw man.

I believe what we were saying is that killing CAN be an art. NOT killing IS art.

Michelangelo wouldnt go to jail for murder he never killed anyone. He SHOULD go to jail for being a faggot pedophile though.

Even the slightest possibility of killing being an art shouldn't exist because it's not and it never will be unless art becomes a sort of crime.

art is defined as an act that defies or undoes nature... killing can be art... not to mention, even if someone does get executed for killing in the name of art, they will be most likely forever remembered, and so will his or her "art"... joining the ranks of michelangelo.

You have no idea what art is. Granted youre a recently turned 15 year old though, so you have ample time to learn.

the point is that art and artistry is not limited to conventional mediums. art is anything creative that manifests internal thought into external communication in a manner that inflames the senses and sensabilities of those who observe it.


murder CAN be art... and is represented as such in films like The Cage, Silence of the Lambs, and books like False Memory.

Oh, the empty reproach of obliteration.

...

well THAT was helpful to the conversation.

There is a line between art and murder. It's morals and our society still recognizes that.

society is a bunch of people that fear what is real... get it straight, you gotta learn that society is not always right... argue how you want, look up the definition of art, webster is on our side...

second, why look at society's definition when all of their artists are egotistical punks who were raised by parents who said their children could grow up to be anything they want... Murder may not seem like an art or like art, but truly, it can be the most heart warming scene you could see... otherwise there would not be web sites posting violent scenes of murder, accidents... etc face it, death can be beautiful for the victem and the viewer...

Morality has nothing to do with art. In your tender age youve yet to discover that.

Art is immoral, incongruous, absolute in its avid need to flaunt societal convention, and always reflects the truth of the society which spawns it

Murder can be a most convincing artform.

Yes, it would be. It'd show that our society has no morals left. My society, however, still puts murderers in jail.

Like OJ?

Orange juice goes good with toast.

Yeah and its also good at getting out of Jail after murdering its wife and her friend.

Our society still seeks out justice, it can't be perfect.

Apparently it doesnt jail murdererss though.

Oh no, never, that's why our jail cells are full of them.