I know that we are all sick of posts about gay marriage but this deserves it's own thread. I love this article.

http://www.sfgate.com/columnists/morford/

hahaha - this bits's the best:

""It's anarchy," some guy named Rick Forcier, of the Washington state chapter of the Christian Coalition, actually whined. "We seem to have lost the rule of law. It's very frightening when every community decides what laws they will obey." Why, yes, Rick. It's total anarchy. Just look at all the screaming and the bloodshed and the gunfire. Run and hide, Rick. The gay people in love are coming. And they've got tattoos and funny haircuts and want to get married and celebrate their love and be left alone. Hide the children. "

Hmm, I dont like how the writer takes the bible verses out of context otherwise it was a good article. Who promised the apoclipse? I dont like homosexuals that is all.

If suicide is not cool, why is it in your profile? If it is cool, why don't you partake in it?

How is it out of contect? It's form Leviticus, the same source that 'theoretically' dmans being gay or doing anyhting gay.

Neon

It may be from Leviticus but it doesnt say that there will be some kind of apoclipse. There are many places in the bible that use analogies that just confuse people who dont read into them. The writer of this article just brings out a portion of the law that could be misleading all that said was gays are bad, dont be one.

Yes however the writier is citing the case of Soddom and Gomorrah and cross referencing with the indications of armageddon as cited in revelation.

It's not out of context, it's an extrapolation of modern fact cross referenced with Christian propeganda...*ahem* sorry i meant the bibical texts.

Neon

Yea I agree with the first part of your post , but i dont really think it was propeganda beacuse you chose to read it you could of spotted that from a mile away.

I liked the article. It was hilarious.

I agree that is hilarious

Bloody hell....

'Cross referenced with Christian Progpeganda', if you're oging to debate this with me, at least read my post!

Neon

Why?
And just becasue you don't like em it doesn't mean they shouldn't be allowed to marry?

Your getting bullied, the bully obvioulsy doesn't like you. Just because someone doesn't like you should it mean you should never be allowed to marry???

??????

He's allowed not to like them and they're allowed not to care, so shut up.

So now your allowed not to like people for no reason what so ever???
When I last checked you look like a discriminative bigot if you don't have a reason, let alone evidence to back up your point.
Its not enough to say you don't like gays per say...you ever met all the gay people in the universe to clarify you don't like em all?
no?
Well then, i don't think its me that needs to shut up...

I think that it's morally incorrect to treat people with bias, and although this usually stems from hating a specific group of people, it doesn't have to. I'm free to dislike some people's lifestyles, for example, but if I treat them all equally, then isn't that morally sound? Don't get me wrong, I'm fully against bigotry - all I'm saying is that you can't forcefully manipulate people into changing their beliefs - it's ethically wrong. They're going to have to come to a conclusion themselves.



I am curious, however, as to Arkantis' justification to disliking homosexuality.

when you think about it, anarchy would be a good thing if it were coorperative instead of violent.

Death to shrimp, death to gays, LONG LIVE MULTIPLE MARRIAGES!

clan marraige has always appealed.

HAHAHA that kicked so much ass! I love people with a good grip on irony.

i would be willing for a group marriage...but nothing quite so large as a commune...