Quote:
Originally posted by SavageBloodCat So would i. i have a lot of patience...But what makes you think Taoists dont' have what it takes to fight for their rights? it's pretty good for me, i'm a passive force person. Actually, when push comes to shove, i'd shove back, and hard. adding in the kick and the bounce of your body thudding on the pavement. i like fighting, pure and simple. *Shrug* anyway...Tao is not peacefully accepting a wrongdoing. it's to prevent it, before it ever happens. Think a moment before you speak, sheesh. |
Actually, when speaking of the Tao, you have to look at the belief of Yin and Yang. Taoists stress the Yin over the Yang, and the Yin is the negative (passive) side. If you act upon things (agressive), you are altering their outcome. Taoism stresses inaction, allowing for the natural course of events to unfold.
That is not to say that Taoists do not affect the world around them, they simply do it passively. Example: Actively campaigning for stronger laws against littering is an agressive action (Yang). A Taoist is simply more likely to pick up litter and dispose of it when he finds it.
Granted this is not a conclusive definition of the Tao. Lao Tzu's writings were deliberately vague, as he claimed it was impossible to speak directly about the Tao.
In your example of fighting, shoving back is agressive, therefore Yang. A Yin reaction to being shoved would be to talk, and if the person shoved again, to work with their action rather than against it, i.e. using their force against them by sidestepping and helping them along to the ground. That action is passive and works in compliment to the Yang force exerted by the shover.
Shadowborn
