just a comment on the whole brother-sister marraige thing... i do believe it's illegal but it's for good reason, if a brother and a sister, or cousins were to procreate then their children would have a higher risk for birth defects

And when gays have sex it spreads AIDs.

...same as straights.

No, there is a far greater chance of AIDs spreading through gay sex than straight sex. Also, gays are more promiscuous than straights.

Maybe if we allow gays to marry, then the marriage vows will help decrease this promiscuity that you claim exists.

Have you got any evidence that gay people are more promiscous oe unmoralistic than straight people????...I find your opinion besides being offensive, also unbenificial to society, generalised and extreamly rascist.

not true, ive spoken to engaged gay men. i went to school with one who wa sin my creative writing class, and he gave me the diddy on gay mens marriages.. the "married" gay male couple RARELY sleep or have sex together... in fact they still have sex with many many numerous partners, but always come home to each other. He said this was the majority for almost all gay commited relationships.

Yes they were the sole carriers of HIV for the most pert and incubated it into being.. they also jokingly term HIV "the gift". Read some books on gays.
How is it racist? im confused, being queer has nothing to do with race, genetics, or anything physical its a choice.

They already exchange vows for civil unions. It hasn't helped.

You can bend statics to favor anything. I could use them to prove that drinking tap water gives people cancer. "In a study of over 1 million cancer patients 98 attested to consuming tap water on a regular basis. Therefore we can conclude that tap water causes cancer."

My point was that although the nature of gay sex does mean HIV has a greater chance of being contracted, you cannot claim that gays as a whole group are more promiscous than straight people...that view is extreramly generalised and has no basis. In my view its racist to accuse one group of being lesser moralistically than another due to nothing more than popular stereotypes.

Its hardly fair to base your whole opinion of gays on one guy you knew is it?
Hardly representative of a large group.

Tomtom - it isn't racist - that term only refers to bigotry about different racial origins. The term you probably mean in the quote above is "bigoted", in which case I agree with you.

yeah bigoted, got confused, am talking about gays as a whole community and group so it made sence at the to think of them as a race, opps

Although it's true that a lot of gay partnerships still have sex with many other partners. How is this wrong?

Who says a relationship MUST be monogamous?

Neon

What are the statstics on civil union? And who is doing the polls on promiscuity?

I can only talk form personal experience Heathen.

I do gay rights work and I know a lot of my clients have that sort of relationship.

God Gay guys yhave this tendancy to tell you EVERYTHING, whether you want to know it or not. ALhtough this does maybe represent a biased grouping (i.e. blatantely out Gay men)

Neon

REALITY: The typical gay man has had between 300-500 sexual "partners." Many gay men have has thousands of one-time sexual encounters. Many bisexual and gay men have never kissed another man condemning such affection as sissified or vulgar.


I'd like to see the statistics on that utter drivel. 300-500 partners?