Let's start insulting her for a reaction because I'm losing this debate.

1st ya moron. It isnt a debate. Debates have structure. 2nd. Where have I lost ground? What WL said? She basically agreed with me. To which you replied "owned" to what I dont know. I am guessing it was your teenaged bravado again.

Yes, that's what it was.
This isn't a debate because you have no ground.
"This news story is more popular than this news story"
What are you trying to prove?

Maybe you should go back and reread, I know you have a penchant for embarrassing yourslef and not noticing it, but this is silly.

No, it's a simple question.
What are you trying to prove?

It's not a matter of popular news stories. News organizations are notorious for reporting half the truth or avoiding it altogether. We live in a time of extreme political correctness, and unfortunately that dribbles over into our news.

The inherent bias and sickness of American culture? THe liberal disease/lie?

I don't see how that has to do with Prussian Blue. What about it? Do you truly think bringing another news story in will make it seem less important? Because it doesn't.

Prussian BLue was brought up bcause around the same time there was another guy who was talking about how blacks needed to mass murder all whites in the USA. If from a fair perspective you wanted to show racism in America, HE would be a prime example. And yet he was nowhere to be seen on the news. However these girls who have no audience, and are really rathe rinconsiquential and dont for example teach a college course the way the other guy do are spread all over the news night after night. Why? Because they are white and racist. THAT is ok to show. the other guy wasnt becaus ehe was BlACK and racist. Cant show that.

You think whites are the bigger victims of racism and that's that. We won't agree.

Yeah just like you think women only need martial arts to be safe. Jackass.

I am a woman. I'll speak for myself.

Jesus... you don't debate with people unless they agree with you. Which kinda defeats the purpose of debating. Time and time again I've seen you bow out on the discussion with some flippant philosophical statement. You've done it in several threads with several people. That's a shitty way to do business.

It's how I roll the dice. =P
I could philosophically involve myself in the debate right now and I can tell you it'd go off better but it's not going by those rules.

Reminds me so much of NMaries...

you spoke for all women.

So, where do you draw the line? It's a matter of sex and I'm speaking for my own.

You didnt say "me or I" you said women. You were speaking for all women. You were wrong.

But all women are of my sex and that was the subject matter. That doesn't make me the least bit "wrong".

You tried to speak for all women. The fact that you said women, instead of mentioning yourself was proof of that. So, wrong.