FULL TEXT

This is one Democrat I'd vote for. He's from a time before thinly disguised communists took over the party.

That's an interesting bit of baiting you did there at the end.
By the way, you do realize that the sheer volume of lies, half-truths and bullshit said by Bush and his supporters is perhaps more than anything ever done?
And that 75% of Bush's advertisements at one point were merely attempts at mocking or ridiculing Kerry, rather than doing anything like promoting his ideas?

Actually, by going through the following link;
ref: http://www.cpusa.org/

I couldn't find any "Democrats" listed as 'Communist Members'.


So do you have any proof, or r u talking 'hyperbole bullshit', as per usual?

Zell Miller...well...after his speech Wolf Blitzer said that he seemed very angry during his talk...and Zell said "No, I was not. I'm sorry if that's the impression that I gave."

Then on Hardball he as much as challenged Chris Matthews to a duel.

This guy is wacko, 100%. I don't think I can count on my fingers the amount of times that Bush refered to American troops in Iraq as an occupying force, and Zell attacks Kerry for the same choice of words. There are some things he said that I actually do agree with...but a lot of his words...I don't know...

The problem is that Republicans have become more conservative in the past four years, and the Democrats more liberal to counter it. When both were fairly moderate, bi-partisan things could happen, but not with it like this. The one at the source is the Bush administration. He is responsible for the neo-cons that pushed the Republicans further to the right than is probably good...and therefore he is responsible for the balancing move for the democrats of becoming more liberal than before. If things don't pull together in the next few years, it's going to be a dangerous time in this country...

At least you're not using a dictionary.

Of course all people who believe in Marxist principles are card carrying members of the Communist Party, since they didn't list their names there they can't possibly be communists.

Look at this link:
http://www.cpusa.org/article/articleview/591/1/27/

They do a Kerry flip-flop in that article, but with more talent than Kerry has. They say they don't support Kerry, then they support Kerry. Kerry should hire those guys to write his speeches.

He had to deny it because being angry is something politicians aren't supposed to do. Of course he's angry. He's seventy something years old, and he's watching the party he's been a lifelong member of go right down the shitter.

If wanting to kick a journalist's ass makes one a wacko, then you can call me that too.

You've got to be kidding me. Aside from the tax cuts, Bush IS a liberal. I don't feel like listing all the liberal things he's done right this minute, it would take too long. Neo-cons are NOT more conservative that the average republican. They are pro-war liberals. The republican party is drifting so far to the left that a lot of conservatives might not vote this year.

Sure, but then consider the insane neo-con base behind Bush.

And I literally mean a duel. As in "Aaron Burr vs. Alexander Hamilton" duel.

He didn't have to do anything. He coulda set a precedent and told the truth.

I'm not exactly sure what you mean by that.

Hell yes he wanted that. He was pissed off at Mathews, who wasn't even a twinkle in his father's eye when Miller was serving his country both in the military and in politics, trying to discredit him.

We're talking about a politician here.

Watch out, or you might get the glove to the face.

I don't own any firearms, but I have a 26 inch sabre, and a six inch daggar. Want to fight?

He was pissed at Matthews because Matthews was asking him what he meant by different things in his speech. Whenever these people get their fucking "talking points" questioned, they take it as personal offense...and it's stupid.

Not havin much luck with words, huh?

Who cares? That was pointless. Keep it relevant. Keep it civil.

I think I know what the problem is. You might not understand the intense frustration conservatives feel when watching mainstream news sources, which are dominated by liberal thought and bias. I can easily understand how Miller got so pissed that he would say something as stupid as the duel comment.

Agreed

OK, i guess the irony here has been missed.

According to Synikul, the guy, by definition, lies.

I just find it funny (well maybe more sad than funny) that Synikul thinks Miller was right to challenge Mathews for trying to discredit him when, by Synikul's definition, Miller had no credibility to begin with.

When I said to Synikul that he might get the glove to the face, I meant by Miller.

Now you know.