Should those who are handicapped be executed as has been done in different places and times? Could it be counted as improving standards?

Do you desire a serious answer to this question, or are you just trolling?

Do you mean mentally challenged people who committ murder and the debate whether or not they should be executed for their crimes or simply execute them because they are handicapped?

That's called eugenics. I'm not for it, as it leads to the power of the state dictating who is allowed to fuck who. Even though I'm an atheist, I think society should maintain at least a basic reverence for life. If we don't, we'll be as bad as the filthy muslims.

You might think there's a contradiction there, but there really isn't.

people can also be temporarily handicapped, hairline fracture that heals in a couple of months don't have anything wrong with their genes. Its not that someone has weaker bones, its a lot of chance. That question was just set up super-shitty b/c it had no background and no specifics involved

No, the contradiction would come with...