I received an email the other day entitled "He's done more damage than we thought" (author unknown) which is a list of failures attributed to President George W. Bush. After careful research and analysis to verify authenticity, I have come to the conclusion that the American people will fire George W. Bush on November 2, 2004 and hire John Kerry by a landslide of votes. I will summarize this list and comment where appropriate.

A. Foreign Policy

1. "Bush is the first president in US history to order a US attack AND military occupation of a sovereign nation, and did so against the will of the United Nations and the vast majority of the international community." While it is true that Congress authorized the President to invade Iraq, the fact that U.S. intelligence was so conflicting brings into question the judgment of Bush. I too was wrong in pushing for the removal of Hussein rather than staying focused on Bin Laden and the other terrorist organizations. Further, it is doubtful that Hussein could have developed WMD under the watchful eye of U.N.weapons inspectors and regular sorties flown by U.S. fighters throughout the no-fly zones (not to mention satellite surveillance). Kerry will need to initiate reconciliation through an international summit of European and Middle Eastern nations to begin the process of cleaning up this mess in Iraq (and worldwide). After the summit, the world will witness the slow withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq and the quick advancement of U.N. troops into Iraq.

2. "Bush recklessly put U.S. soldiers in harms way by invading Iraq in search of weapons of mass destruction which still have not been found." In doing so, he has compromised the war on terrorism by directing 200 billion dollars for an overt combat operation as opposed to a covert operation. The United States has lost over 1,000 soldiers and thousands more are severely maimed prompting some to ask: hey hey GWB, how many kids will it be? The wiser choice would have been to invest 50 billion dollars in covert operations and 50 billion in homeland security. Besides, using conventional troops to fight terrorists is similar to the British army using regulars to fight French guerrillas during the Revolutionary War. Consequently, volunteerism for U.S. military service has sharply declined for all branches prompting rumors of a draft. Kerry will need to redirect resources to enhance homeland security while getting many more nations to share in troop and money commitments overseas especially in Iraq. He will also need to push Saudi Arabia and China to administer sanctions against Iran and North Korea to prevent further nuclear proliferation. Most importantly, however, he will need to fight terrorists overseas through covert operations.

B. Domestic Policy

1. "Bush spent the U.S. surplus and shattered the record for the biggest annual deficit in history." Bush's tax cuts to the wealthy along with irresponsible subsidizing of the war in Iraq has taken the U.S. budget from dark black to bright red all in the span of four years. Another four years of this squandering will bankrupt the United States. The remaining 100 billion dollars (from above) could have been invested in domestic programs like health care, education and the infrastructure. Kerry will need to revoke the tax cuts for the rich and reduce the United State's financial/military commitment in Iraq. These two changes (along with others) should result in a balanced budget in four years with the possibility of a return to a budget surplus in eight years.

2. "Bush entered office with the strongest economy in US history and in less than two years turned every single economic category heading straight down. His first two years in office resulted in 2 million Americans losing their jobs AND he cut unemployment benefits for more out-of-work Americans than any other president in US History." His presidency has been the most "in-your-face" support of the wealthy whether it be tax cuts, the lack of an energy and environmental policy, failure to crack down hard on corporate corruption etc. Kerry will need to bring back former Clinton advisor Robert Ruben to turn the economy around just as was done after the failed administration of Bush Sr. Kerry will need to fast-track the operationalizing of alternative energy sources in order to reduce U.S. dependence on Middle Eastern oil specifically and world oil in general. As a former prosecutor, he will need to push for long-term prison sentences for those committing white-collar crimes and reduce the difficulty of prosecuting the likes of Ken Ley.

Conclusion

The failures by George W. Bush, the viable alternative of John Kerry, the massive number of newly registered voters, the amount of attention being given by the American people on this election and the mass media trying to spin this race as being close are all clear signs of a Kerry landslide. On the November 2, 2004 the people will speak loud and clear.

That name freaked me out for a moment. Cuz I went to high school with this kid named JEff Bialeki. And he was a douche.

But yeah... I don't see Kerry as a viable alternative. I see Kerry as the ONLY alternative. And given the fact that they're both douches, it's not a matter of the people making some clear-cut choice (and might I add that "the people will speak loud and clear" is a mad gheigh statement). As always, it's voting for the lesser of two evils.

This statement is pure fantasy.

disagree

for some, it's a fervent prayer...

This is true.

Most polls show the two as neck and neck; I believe this to be a pretty firm indication that a "landslide" victory is out of the question. Tallying the respective successes and failures of a president and then attempting to either quantify or qualify them will always bear deceptive results. In this case, the tallied "failures" of G. W. Bush don't take into consideration the fact that very many people are hesitant if not completely unwilling to unseat a president, i.e. a Commander in Chief, while there is a war going on.

I dont think i'm the only one here who thinks the polls everyone looks at are not very accurate at all. I don't think with the way there being done, they're able to reach younger voters. And with the expected huge turnout of younger voters this year, and how a huge majority of them are more Kerry supporters...I think maybe not a landslide, but close to a landslide is not out of the question. And on the thing about changing leaders during a time of war...I think most people think Bush hasn't handled the war properly anyway, so I don't think that would be a problem for Kerry anyway. Like he said, "If your horse is drowning through midstream, it's a good idea to switch them..." Or something like that.

I've seen some predictions of a Bush landslide that aren't much more credible than this. No matter who wins, it will be close.

Yet, though we keep constantly referring to this as the 'war in Iraq', I don't remember there ever actually being a declaration of war by Congress...

That little technicality aside, I think this election will be every bit as close as the one 4 years ago...hopefully we won't see the need for lawyers to decide who becomes president this time around.

if bush does win again, it'll be by the same tactics employed when he won over gore...

they stole it once, i hope it isn't allowed to happen again.

Sadly, a lot of people are probably buying the pure bullshit thrown around by both Kerry and Bush in their advertisements.

And who can blame them, why the hell would they be allowed to lie to us on television continually, right?
Wrong.

The First Amendment allows Politicians the right to put out advertisements that are containing factual errors, designed to be slander or anything along those lines.

Slander and libel are not protected under the First Amendment. They just manage to put enough spin on what they put out that it isn't actually considered slander...

Actually, congress did vote for the president to have the authority to chose to go to war or not against Iraq. That was the bill that the pubs accused Kerry of voting for, saying he "voted to go to war". And the bill the dems accused Bush of for not following the necessary steps to go to war...

at the time, bush had a lot of people believing the war was a good war, why blame kerry because he was as deceived as the rest of america? at least kerry can admit it was a wrong choice.

Exactly. Congress circumvented the process as laid down by the framework of our government. Shame on them...all of 'em, Democrats and Republicans alike.

After the election, The New York Times, and The Washington Post, which aren't bastions of conservative thought, counted all the votes over again, and found that Bush won Florida by 537 votes. Get over it.

And, of course, there were a lot of overseas ballots in favor of Bush which were past the normal cut off point that were counted, and of course the massive amount of African Americans that were not allowed to vote because magically they had criminal records without having committed any crimes, and so on and so forth.

You know as well as I that Florida reeked of bullshit.

I just want to know if it was the only state that did.

Personally, I hate Bush... He has a hardon for war and hes really fucking stupid... I lost my faith In Tony Blair also when that fucker went against the people in the UK and just for the fuck of it... Helped bush out. They both suck. And why the fuck would Bush want Englands help anyway? We are all socialists damnit... The only person in the UK that isn't is Blair... Oh and that stupid bitch Thatcher but she suffers from of fungus whitetrashicus which isn't her fault.... Oh yeah, yeah it is her fault!

I hope Bush doesn't get elected this time... Hes a fuckwit.