Ahh, but you see.. war is good for the economy, sex is not.. ERGO, what bushy is doing is acceptable, what Clinton did was not.. religion always backs war, not sex..

War in general isnt good for economies imo. Its what happens after war that is good for them. Consumer confidence increases, goodwill between the enemies of the invaded country increase, the new government can be influenced to a greater extent and that makes them a viable trading partner, spoils of war, reparations and reconstruction debts help offset the cost of going to war in the first place.
Politically, war always get the support of the blind patriot or one willing to turn a blind eye to one fact or another. Clinton didnt just lie about sex, he lied in court about it (right?). Within the current political views of any country, the image of a moral political leader is harder to sustain than how a country views itself. Any personal actions that can not be excused as something good for the state have more impact on how a leader is viewed.

And is it just me or is America really starting to look like 1984? Yes, of course it's not communist, but the tendencies are frighteningly similar- Newspeak, where words like "war" and other words are replaced by ambiguous euphemisims. The feeling of constant terror that the media propagates to keep people angry and keep fingers pointed outside of the governement. And of course the lies that never get called back upon- didn't Bush say in a speech last month that we WEREN'T expecting to find weapons of mass destructions?

There are a few of us over here in England which think we left it too long to find any weapons of mass destruction.
The reason I think this is coz, too much was said about us going in to get the weapons.
I don't think Saddam is that dumb just to leave his weapons of mass destruction laying around for us to find.

My thinking for why we went to war is, there is always a feeling that we all must fight.
It's just part of being human.
This may sound dumb to you but it was been a while since we had a war and Saddam just happend to be there at the right time and place for it to happen.
Plus, Bush needs to make it back up to USA for not being able to get Bin what's his face.
Since Bin what's his face hit the US, the people have been looking to Bush to do something about it and then had to take the heat off him and put onto someone else and that is when Saddam came in plus he had all that lovely oil which could make someone really rich and really cheap.

I shall shut up now.

One again I find myself considering moving to Canada.

http://www.buzzflash.com/contributor...23_resume.html

I won't say anymore (I know what I know) but be damned sure a little search on google will give many more details....

LOL you know, i believe most of that is true!!!

i'm going to mc gill in montreal for college... damn bush...

lol most of what?? what we've said?? of course it's true...

hehe i meant the resume on sinner's link..

Yep, most if not all of that is true... But it's all in the delivery... Don't get me wrong though, I hate the republican cowboy oil tycoon monkey motherfucker as much as anyone else... And just to keep this thread going... http://www.realchange.org/bushjr.htm (long read but good)