I'm not supporting evidence either way here... but I'm writing a speech trying to convince people that we DIDN'T land on the moon. I don't really beleive that, but it's my assignment. So if anyone has found any interesting information on the subject, you'd be a great help. Thanks a ton

Cheers

I think there are/were several threads along this line before.. I'll look for them.. If i find em, i'll bump em back to the front page or pm the link to you..

But it's time to rehash this one..
Let's see.. photos were wierd, who took some of them, statements made by astronauts that may have contradicted, Could it have actually been accomplished at the time.. Movies made showing both possibilities.. ect..

I haven't seen any real evidence to support that it was faked that can't be explained. I'd like to see some if you have any though. A friend and I went through all the pictures and statements and supposed evidence we could find regarding the subject, about a year or two ago. We researched it and couldn't find any real evidence that it was faked.

well, I don't have any evidence... no one really does. I think the whole idea is pretty preposterous, but it's funny. Most of the "evidence" is people just freaking out about stupid shit that doesn't even matter. Ugh, I'm getting a headache from all the conspiracy fuckshits... I'm going to sleep.

i am not a fuckshit thank you..

LOL... maybe not you, but certainly the people on the websites I was looking at earlier.

I saw a documentary supporting the idea that it was faked that looked pretty convincing. There were some photographs taken where multiple shadows were cast, and some where the backgrounds looked exactly the same even though the photos were supposed to be of different locations. And they were saying that the technology used wouldn't have protected the astronauts from the radiation in space. I don't know, I don't really care if it was faked, but it was pretty interesting.

Yeah, the similar locations is pretty much the only real evidence to support it, that can't really be explained.

The problem with those 'documentary' shows is that they only show one half - the supposed 'evidence'. They deliberately leave out the actual scientific explanations most of the time.

Has anyone ever sent film through the x-ray machines at the airports?? Do you remember what happened to it???
Think of the 'older' film technology then and what would have happened to it with the excessive radiation in space...
Maybe the pics are fake cause the film sucked and they needed pics to prove that they Actually DID land on the moon..

Just an idea....
*gives credit to Dyshade for the thought*

interesting theory Tiggr/Dyshade... I know I lost three rolls of film last time I was at an airport. Stupid me. Anyway, that's not the point. If there really was film on the REAL moon, and it was destroyed, how many people would have believed it?

you have to understand the time period..
Cops were still called pigs.
The Beatles were still on top of the charts.
Teachers were allowed to Whack kids with rulers..
Punishment fit the crime.
LSD was a new drug...(not the shit they have nowadays)


So Pictures WERE REQUIRED to prove they did it..
Who cares if the film was destroyed due to radiation(they would have killed NASA altogether if the people thought that.), They NEEDED pictures to calm the masses.. And show up the Red Menace.

Sorry, got lost there.. What was your question??

Just one small bit on the subject. In one of the videos showing them plant the flag, the flag is waving as if wind was flowing, well last i checked there is no atmosphere on the moon, hence no wind, and dont pull that solar wind crap its all magnetics.

I just cant help think what will happen if someone can proove that no man ever landed on the moon.
One word comes in my mind after that :
Hypocricy.

It was in a wire frame, and he was twisting the pole to plant it in the ground. Which caused the effect you're talking about.

How do you think our government is run now, all it is anymore is Hypocricy.

There is so much controversy over this issue:

DID U.S land on the moon? Either way you look at it, wheether they DID or NOT, something is definately FISHY.

I have been doing various researching lately (mostly on planet but I have came across one peticular theory that got me thinking: (I can't find the exact link, but I will post it when I find it)
It proposes that U.S DID IN FACT, land on the moon... What they found when they got there was ruins and crystals, built by an far more advanced species: The Ananaki. They used the crystals as means of communication between earth and mars while they mined earth for gold. Here's the cover-up/conspiracy: THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T WANT US TO KNOW. WHY THE LIES?!
There are many "suspected" cover-ups out there.

A few sites where you can find more info on other government cover-ups:

Http://www.geocities.com/TheTropics/...71/page00.html

http://www.zetatalk.com

lol, zetatalk. I love nutjob sites.

Well, I find some of the info on Zeta Talk rather intrigueing. It may not neccecarily be true, but they have some pretty cool different veiws on things.
Everybody has a different opinion.

They claim that one of them psychically communicates with Aliens. They're also responsible for the Nibiru passing and creating the end of the world scenario (the date keeps being pushed back, as each date passes without incident) that so many nut jobs are scared of.

now now, eventually they'll be right ya know!!!