If you believe that your personal philosophy can create a better world where people would be happier and better off than today then does spreading your philosophies become your moral duty?

Basically you would be keeping the information that could potentially make the lives of people better if you don't share it.

Sharing your beliefs would mean that you would create lots of enemies and be the target of ridicule.

Should we all go out and start preaching to the world what we think is better for everyone because it is our moral duty?

I think it would behoove you to SHARE your ideas and philosophies but noy beat people over the head with them. Other's may have their own knowledge or beliefs that they feel just as strongly about.

I do agree with Chicago somewhat...

If I truly believe that it's better for the world, yes I would.. But the word “preaching” has a superior connotation to it, so I’d more likely choose “sharing” approach of my philosophical view.

In terms of creating many enemies and being a target for ridicule, I can deal with it to a quite high degree I believe.

I made the decision a while ago to 'share' as much information as possible with anyone who wishes to 'share' information with me.

The trouble with this, though, is that everyone who wants to 'share' is a Christian of some sort or another. Most don't like it, some start calling me 'evil' and other nonsense, and others make for the exit.

I'm not that scary, and I don't smell bad.

I think that we should share things if we want to. I don't think that in any manner of fashion it is a DUTY to do it. Of course we can feel moraly obligued to tell someon they are doing something 'bad', but we can shut up, and let whatever hapens hapen.
It is fun to talk about ideals with others, it is always fun to do some convincing. But it is not required of us, and it does not necesarily have good outcomes. But whatever, we must all do what we feel is right.

I will share with those who are willing to listen but at the same time I don't really think that I have the power to change the World.

my philosophy is readily apparent in my words and deeds... so the arguement as to whether or not one SHOULD is immaterial to me as its too late, baby.

honestly, though, i'm a fan of live and let live... sure, it's kosher to share, but the minute i say "not interested," button up.

Hmm . . . I didn't think of it that way.

Yes. However, the catch is that people don't like being made to feel that they're being pushed, so the ideal way to spread your philosophy is that which involves minimum exertion most of the time. Or in the words of St. Francis, paraphrased because I'm lazy, "Go out and preach the gospel to the whole world, even, if necessary, with words."

If you think your philosophy would make the world a better place then you should share it.

"your rights end where mine begin" is pretty solid I think.

do what you want but don't be needlessly physically destructive to tangible things including/ but not limited to people (unless it is yourself, that is your right as far as Im concerned).

How many people enjoy being preached to about anything, and who is the judge of morality?

if a person really feels that their personal philosophy would create a better world,than write a self help book or go the infomercial routet, those are unobtrusive way that let people decide if your philosophy is right for them or not, and allow them to change the channel or shelf the book if not.

I could easily go tell people what makes my life so much "better" than theirs, but would that be accurate or fair to them, would they look at my life and agree. What would make a person preaching their philosophy any different than those who preach the word of god in a way that make people despise that religion, how many people like Dr. Phil's philosophy or take Richard Simmon's philosophy on health and fitness serious?

i wouldn't bother, if a person inquired why i am happy, content in my marriage or able to pleasantly deal with people, even those i can't stand, i'd be willing to share, but i wouldn't want to force my ideals on anyone else...i don't liek it when people force theirs on me.

without the option of mass media, a public lifestyle or avid followers to do the work could a person really have an affect on one person, much less the world with only words?

not even jesus could do that...he backed it up with actions, and look at what's become of his philosophies.

Still, I do believe that some 'enlightment' is necesary, not that what i believe is absolutely true, but i sometimes (very rarely) u just want to smack children, and tell them what is right and what is not... Like kids destroying plants, or harrasing animals.... and sometimes, our ideals must be imposed when we cannot tolerate the oposite. like with neighbors u can-t stand, and need to reach an agreement...

i was gonna stay out of this thread, but figured i'd throw my two cents in on the topic, seein' as i'm a philosophy whore and all...

personal philosophies? fuck your personal philosophy, unless (if and only if) it is justified by some class of justification....

if your a religious fanatic, and your personal "philosophy" is religious in structure, then by all means, go out and preach your word to as many religious nuts as possible, but leave the science and open-minded individuals alone...

now i am at fault of spreadin' my personal philosophies, but not in a direct way....i'm a philosopher (if you grant me the title because i have a B.A. in the subject) and i wax philosophical with everyone i know....everything from "existentialism" to "aestheticism" to "absurdity" to "theology" (most of you prolly have no idea what i'm talkin' about, but neither do most people i talk to)......

but it's annoyin'.......it just seems that those with knowledge of philosophy, who indeed spreads their own personal philosophies, is open to more attacks from the public than other such individuals (like Dr. Phil)...and what's worse, a philosopher's personal philosophy is bound to be more justified than any other individuals personal philosophy (save for an open-minded scientist)...

I think we all have the right to share our own opinions with others who are willing to listen. But the beauty of free will is that we choose what we believe ourselves. I think that if you're smart you'll listen to anyone's take on life if they throw it out there. I think if they're smart they'll present it to you as simply an alternative way of thinking for your consideration than the one you currently embrace as opposed to The only way or the highway. The best approach I've found to all of it is to consider other people's philosophies or opinions, guage what kind of bearing it may or may not have on your current situation or life, and either adapt it or reject it accordingly. But always listen with an open mind and know that what doesn't work or isn't agreeable for you is probably so because it's more suited for the other guy.

how do you feel when a fantical person tries to push any belief on you?

in this lies the problem the push and pull between what people believe, what ideas they have and wht they put faith in.

imagine for a second if you will a world in which people understand that their beliefs are theirs.

it is belief that is dangerous because people feel a need to spread it and feel threatened by someone whom does not share the same belief.

unfortunatly the only way to truly impact the world is to provide somthing that people can believe in.

So with that being said what would you think gives someone the right to shape someone elses beliefs? If the personnel philisophy benfits mankind (lets not forget that you believe it benfits mankind) should it be "preached"? I wonder if anything has happened in histroy that shows maybe what one indivdual thinks benfits mankind maybe in practice doesnt benfit mankind?

Looking at the life of Jesus he preached/shared at/with the Pharisees and Sadducees and preached/shared at/with everyone else.

The Pharisees and Sudducees hated what He said . But the majority loved what he said. The words of Jesus offended the Pharisees and Sadducees because they had an understanding of what Truth was and there minds were closed to His words.

When someone preaches, they should be preaching basic fundamentals that everyone can understand. Thats what made Jesus so influential. The Pharisees realised that Jesus understood them, but out of fear of the truth He spoke, they didn't listen. However, the Pharisees followed Him and some become his followers.

Preachers these days fail to understand their audiences needs and desires and easily offend the average joe-blow due to their words and actions.

When Jesus preached he made sure peoples needs were met. Thats why he was so influential: he walked the walk and talked the talk. That's why he had so many followers.

The word 'preach' these days seems to have a negative connotation. If someone preaches at you, it's 'I'm not listening' and you can't escape them. But if someone shares with you, its like 'I'm listening'.

Their are many ways people can preach at you, some you will receive warmly. Others not so warm.
Believe me. I also get offended with Christians who preach but fail to understand who they are. They get you all uptight and you get pissed off with them.

For me, Actions-->talking about my philosophy/beliefs-->a potential argument/conversation(i hate ppl that argue about arguing....anyway)-->me better understaning my philosophies and beliefs. So, yes i think it is our "duty" to talk about the way we pe