"The chinaman is not the issue!"

that's just it, you can't assume that, because further exploration and experimentation consistantly and to this day proves the laws have flaws. The rules are continuously being rewirtten.

But some of them don't change.

...and?

We can rely on them. We use them to create new theories. You can assume that something is true when it's proved.

You know, logic is a systemathic method of coming to the wrong conlusion with confidence...

not all of them though

So...

so therefore some things can't yet be explained

Vee Beleeve Een Nosink

wow... i love this. And you must assume that we started with a singularity for the universe (The leading therory) and thats was the closests thing to nothing. The big bang was the singulairty reaching balance and then needing to not be balanced. It's so crazy to understand man... but i do. it's all matrix 2 and 3 kind of. i'll start on monday to give you all some time to see it.

okay, i really don't want this thread to turn into a Matrix philosophy thread, so if you have anything to post to that effect, please create a new one... thank you.

sorry, but i was just using it as support. i could start a matrix philosiphy thread. hum....