Yup, I'd agree that the concept of honour in the western world at this point in time is predominantly a male affectation. However, you only have to go back a few decades to the concept of a woman who has been "dishonoured" to see a female equivalent. I don't know about non-western concepts of honour because I've never studied them (or watched that many martial arts films

)
Certainly, though, in patriarchal societies the concept of honour lies mainly upon men, but only because of the objectification of women - afterall, how can a possession have any honour?
Is honour without emotion - I'd say yes. Honour is a code of behaviour (or the state of adhering to a code of behaviour), rather than an emotion. Adhering to that code of behaviour may
produce emotion (pride, contentedness) as will deviating from it (shame, guilt etc).
Is shame directly related to honour - well, it's certainly tied up in the whole concept. Honour is the set of social rules, and shame is a learned behaviour which works as a rod to the carrots of "pride" and "being accepted". er. so to speak.
how does guilt differ from shame. hmmm - that's a good one. I'm no expert in psychology, so a quick search on Google will have to suffice:
"Guilt says I've done something wrong; shame says there is something wrong with me.
Guilt says I've made a mistake; shame says I am a mistake.
Guilt says what did was not good; shame says I am no good." Bradshaw, John (1988). "Bradshaw on: The Family" Health Communications: Deerfield Beach, FL.
alternatively, a simple difference seems to be that guilt is felt when you've done something you believe is "wrong" but no one else knows, and shame is felt when you've done something society thinks is "wrong" and people around you know about it (or you believe that they do).
I don't know which (if either) is the psychological definition, though.