Woman are able to abstain more easily, than men.

i think it comes down more to emotion and manipulation than the physical act. Women know how to use their emotion and in ways are taught how to use physical to appeal to men. Who's better received, the pleasant looking female with ample breasts and a sexual charisma or the serious business woman type that's in your face and strong?


Society has a view, kind of an expectation of women, this is something started as soon as baby girls are put in pink t-shirts, and baby boys are put in blue right from birth. Females are encouraged to be emotional...males are encouraged to be strong...woman are encouraged to be defenseless maidens in distress or the tempting whore...men are either the noble defender or the man's man.

Woman were left with only one avenue to achieve any status, power or means to a better life...their sex and what they have to offer...emotion, and most do associate sex and emotion as being the same...sometimes it's almost too easy...

I was once having a battle of the sexes conversation with a group of men...this was during my more feministic times, they were saying that women needed men and could not survive with out them...naturally i was taking the defensed that a woman can do it on her own...one of the guys, a sexy blonde named adam visiting from seattle discussed his theory...

Men are left with an emotional void, being raised with the "real men don't cry" concept...women fill that emotional hole, i guess you could say the emotion that men are forbidden...if a person learns how to master, manipulate and use emotion...you know how to use what everyone has, but not all are adept in using...toss in physical pleasure and it could be considered a weapon...but that depends on how a person uses it...it was at this time that i emerged out of the "better sex" thought and emerged to my current state that each have their positives and negatives...( do tend to favor men however )but back on point...

women tend to have that talent easier than most men because emotions are enouraged and nurtured in women...men are encouraged to be...well men.

fortunately these double standards are slowly being phased out...now it's not such a bad thing if a man cries, bitches or whines...and women are slowly showing they can be an intellectual force to be reckoned with, doing most jobs that at one time only men could do...but there's still a long way to go before a utopian atmosphere of equality and peace can reign between the sexes...unless a person partners wisely...but than that person has to be wise in the partnership, but that's a different story

but i have to agree with the original statement...i believe women do have an advantage when it comes to sex...for years they've been nothing but sex.

so if a man were to be emotinal in spite of society, then he would have no need of a woman?

oh god, please no.......

what?

Maybe you refer to it as sexual weaponry (female 'power') as it reflects male weakness by their need for it. I don't consider it a legitimate form of intelligent influence. 60 years ago the most confident of women would not have had the opportunity to vote, Tent.

not quite, women just would not have an edge over him...he'd know his own emotions, and than he could manipulate other's emotions just the same if he so wished it...and there are those that do...how many don juans are out there?

my point wasn't that either sex can exist without the other...there's just degrees, at some point that need stops being derived from passion and lust and becomes a more comfortable complimenting of strengths and weaknesses....that's what makes a good relationship.

and just hundreds of years before the bible many war like cultures allowed women equal rights to that of any man, some even placed women akin to goddesses because of their perceived ability to create life...they could rule tribes, decide to divorce an unworthy husband, retaining land and even having the title passed to them rather than a son...funny how times change.

yeah, you're very right about that, jordyn. yet notice that in the bible, women are considered subordinate to men. humph!

Women had knowledge of "good and evil" first. Never forget that. After that happened it's a whole new ball game. You'll only feel subordinate to your Adam (soul mate). Feelings are fleeting.

I thought of a good description of "love." Love is wanting and doing things for another person, so they may have a good life. Love can also be respecting and admiring someone.

Looking through the dictionary love is too often defined just for couples and copulating. Love is more than just a fuzzy feeling or being passionate. Catholics would have died off a long time ago because they can't Mastrabate. You love others like yourself. "Tough Love" sounds pretty ugly too. What are you doing to your children?

:spam:

God, bring on a good relationship, please.


as the pendulum swings.

if you ask and are really ready to exist with another person as one, while keeping seperate identities...you'll be granted one...but it's never easy, but worth every sacrifice offered for happiness.

Men are also emotional but usually quiet. Women do have less tact really on average.

that may be true of some women, but not all. i know plenty of guys who aren't afraid to say what they're thinking.

Men are usually happy to say what they're thinking, just can't say what they're feeling, usually because they don't know themselves.

lol, ain't that the truth

i know myself......i can last three minutes in the sack :-)

In sex ed we are taught that it is impossible for a guy to piss through an erection. This is entirely false. I do it regularly. As was mentioned, morning wood is the key. My only difficulty is aiming, but I take care of that by sitting down and pushing the chubby downwards enough to splash into the bowl. And that's that.

One common mistake people make is assuming a male orgasm is physically obvious, ie. semen. This is not true. Orgasm and ejaculation are actually two separate events. They tend to occur at the same time, though, and so are often confused. It is possible to have one without the other. I've had many orgasms without ejaculation, though as I got older that seemed to diminish greatly. Now I always cum when I cum. The great thing is that when you orgasm without ejaculation, you stay hard. This doesn't mean you can't stay hard after ejaculating, but if you develop control you could be multi-orgasmic. Why let the women have all the fun?

I take it you're not multi-orgasmic then?

i get lots of little orgasms, and hardly ever any one big orgasm, its kind of weird.