<~~~me thinking of my reasons.

When the subject is alive, it is a bad idea.

However, when the subject is dead, I would have no problems with it. With either preforming or being preformed on.

much better than vivisection ill tell u

with the subject being dead, how about if they were killed for the dissection? does that mean the same thing? example: a class set of rats that a killed before class to be dissected?

at our school when i did science we dissected eyes and lungs i think. the animals were already dead - i think the teacher got them from a butcher so i had no qualms with that. only they smelled really bad because they weren't all that fresh - since they weren't to be eaten i don't think they stored them very well at all.

i'm not sure what else they dissect though since i was only doing 5th form/year 11 science then. i'd think in higher levels they might dissect "better" stuff but i haven't heard anything about it.

i would only dissect an animal if i know where the animal came from. i'm wouldn't dissect an animal if it was killed just for dissection.

go me!

I prefer that they dissect animals to see how things work rather then disection people to see how things work.

Vivisection is a different matter

I wouldn`t do it. I dont even like eating chicken of the bone.

what is vivisection?


i can dissect anything. in biology i cut the pig open and spilled out wilbur's guts they girls thought i was a freaky weirdo mad scientist.

Vivisection is disecting something that's still alive

i wouldn't do that. that's just bad.

vivisection:is this done in schools?

and with human dissection, i think it is good for medical purposes. dissecting an animal to practice or learn how a human heart works probably wouldn't cut it. and sides if you were to be operated on, and it was the surgeons first time would you be more confident if you knew that they had practiced on more than wilbur or our other friends?