They also love the cock.

That's exactly it. Those who are clean, cut, and respect women couldn't be straight because to be straight you'd have to be Billy who is the very opposite.

you're just pissed you have to have sex through a hole in the sheet

LOL dont be mad at me that the Gotti kids love cock. And you cannot call the Gotti kids clean cut... they look greasy as hell. And orange...what the fuck is it with people and orange skin?

My boyfriend's clean, cut, and respectful..

And I'm fairly sure he's indulged in the cock once before. He won't admit it. But I think he has.

what kind of a discussion is this? "hey should we drink hot magma or liquid nitrogen?"
a world run by women would become a haven for STD's. Yeah I said it. As horny as women think men are, it'd be a real treat to see how women would act when it were up to them to decide when you're overdoing the sex preoccupation. Damnit.
Next thing to consider is: What do you want to govern your society? A nurturer or a logistic person. Hmm. That's tough.
Men are inclined, generally speaking, to base their thoughts of concrete truths, whereas women try to be fair and crap like that. awesome shit for raising kids, but not for governing finances and all that happiness.

Yes, let's take mother nature into consideration. If you're an albino monkey, you're bound to get one too many sunburns and die. I really doubt you're albino genetics are gonna get far. "Survival of the fittest". That's nature for you. So if nature's a mother, she's butch as hell.
Now if we applied nature's reasoning to our societies, the lazy and the fat alike would receive the "go to hell" treatment and die off. ergo people would be a lot stronger in body or smarter, because those are the genetics that would pass on. But thanks to welfare and crap, we've got albino monkeys and retarded wildebeests running rampant. That's the "fair" (aka nurturing) side of society.

Good news Billy. If you're right and the matriarchal society does come to head, it's gonna fall right back flat on its ass. Sorry gals. Occasionally you'll get your Queen Elizabeth and what not, and that's fine. Mother nature is fine by my book because she keeps it masculine.

hahahahaha... I nearly pee'd myself.

just go to wal-mart. take a camera.

So, fair is not true and true is not fair? Men aren't fair and women aren't true? Concrete truth my ass.

No, fair is rarely true.

Do explain and back your claim.

Its simple, Fair is rarely truthful. For example FAIR would be that everyone is equal and capible of the same things. This is not true. Because its impossible. Its also not truthful because it wouldnt be fair to people who are actually more talented than others.

For example Affirimitive action makes the workplace numbers more "fair" but its not truly fair because the numbers are not natural, and it took away from other people to force a standard. Its not truthful.

You're right, but that wouldn't be fair then, would it?

Did you intentionally ask a cryptic question in the hopes of saving face while confusing others?

I'm attempting to simplify not complicate. You said it yourself.
It's not fair unless it's true which says that they are not separate. Bingo.

Uhh no... thats like saying coffee and dog shit are the same because we mentioned them in the same sentence. I suppose the connection is sort of there what with them being co-independant nouns of the same sentence, but outside of that... no.

No, you said outrightly that it wasn't fair because it wasn't truthful.

No I said it wasnt fair because of its own reasoning. And ALSO that it wasnt truthful. Semantics aside, whats your point? Truth and Fair rarely coincide.

And when they don't they're not true or fair.

?