 | | | Brain Candy
Posts: 3,873
Gallery:
0
Comments: 0
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: A paddy in Engerland.... Zodiac Sign:
Aquarius
|
10-29-06
Quote:
Originally Posted by lightlucifer the simplest thing to do is create or reamove heat. It is actuallly possible to boil water without any extra source of heat. | I respectfully disagree, people ususally want to start with the easisest thing first, if someone tries heat transfer and it doesn't work the first time, they will probably give up. Even if they do manage it, they may doubt it's anything more than bodyheat.
Dust is a better starting point, far less is required to influence a falling dust mote.
It's already falling, you just gently nudge it in one direction after another as it falls.
All of the props of magic are just that.
They are there to strengthen your will power.
(I know that's a whole other debate but..)
If you believe that finding a penny will bring you good luck all day..guess what happens 
© Feroluce™ 2001-08, The authors, affiliates and their subsidiary companys accept no responsability for any coherence in the above or any aforementioned or prior correspondance. The above opinion may contain information unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs. | |
| | | Registered User
Posts: 8
Gallery:
0
Comments: 0
Join Date: Oct 2006 |
10-30-06
Well my opinion is that selected parts of both is powerful, but ultimatly its the pure will (as in the "will/desire" to act and have effect) put into it that paticuler idea or belife, and how much "Will" dis belive it....
As for solid proof that there is magyk or magick you may want to look into quantem phyisics because at long last they finaly proven what all basic and complex religons have know for years, that ideals and belifes make up all things and that the ones most wanted through "Will" keeping in mind that others will "Will" agenst it is what "is" ("Is" being all this and possibilitys),
though the research is limtited mostly being done on some of the worlds largest brain's spare time (nobel prize, yale, people thats head swell becase they think to much) there is concret evidence not just in mathmatical equstions but also in common mass,
A good movie to watch would be "What the bleep you know" though it also contains alot you wount need to know. aslo the stringe theroy could possibuly tie into this. | |
| | | Grand Master Geek
Posts: 10,118
Gallery:
0
Comments: 0
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Spokane, Wa Zodiac Sign:
Aries
Rating:
|
10-31-06
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 11 Two words for you: Narrow minded. One word if you hyphenate it. | Two words back at you: verifiable evidence. I suppose you could hyphenate it if you wanted to, but that would just be silly. Shadowborn To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I feel this way on DF...a lot. | |
| | | SchmInKY
Posts: 1,347
Comments: 0
Join Date: Aug 2006 |
10-31-06
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim As for solid proof that there is magyk or magick you may want to look into quantem phyisics | Maybe someone can clarify for me: people often state that observing particles changes their action (or vibration, or something); when we studied this situation way back in Physics class, it was the presence of the electrically charged particals in the observer coming close to the observed particles that affected them, not the actual decision to observe. Is the afore-mentioned statement a misunderstanding of the actual nature of the affect on the particles, or have I missed something? | |
| | | Ooglemagthorpe
Posts: 5,590
Gallery:
0
Comments: 0
Join Date: Sep 2000 |
11-01-06
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackHeart1014u Something else, thefr0g, there are no whale women in Wicca, theyre regular people. | No, most of them are whale women. Just like most goth girls. Fat girls usually have to do something to stand out and get the attention that pretty girls get just by entereing a room. | |
| | | Brain Candy
Posts: 3,873
Gallery:
0
Comments: 0
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: A paddy in Engerland.... Zodiac Sign:
Aquarius
|
11-01-06
Quote:
Originally Posted by InKY Maybe someone can clarify for me: people often state that observing particles changes their action (or vibration, or something); when we studied this situation way back in Physics class, it was the presence of the electrically charged particals in the observer coming close to the observed particles that affected them, not the actual decision to observe. Is the afore-mentioned statement a misunderstanding of the actual nature of the affect on the particles, or have I missed something? | Woah, you're stepping into Schroedinger's cat and the whole causality debate there.
That's a whole different can of worms.
Scientists can class quite a lot of effects as 'Unproven' with this method.
The basic arguement that you being there to observe affects the results of the experiment, but to prove that 'will' (I'm not getting into a semantic debate about the spelling of 'magic') can affect the outcome of an experiment, someone has to be there.
Using this arguement it will be completely impossible to ever prove that unexplained phenomena exist, this is a wall that science can throw up at any time to say 'if we don't know what it is, then it doesn't exist'.
It's the scientific version of the 'faith' arguement that religion uses.
The majority of scientists are open to the fact that they don't know everything, and that there may be something unexplained happening that may be explainable in the future.
The problem is that the heavy hitters in the science world are pretty confident in their omniscience and will shoot down anything that may give the impression that they can't explain something.
If you want a perfect example of something that can be proven to work yet have no scientific explanation, just look at dowsing.
(Sorry for veering away from your point a little Inky, I got carried away)
© Feroluce™ 2001-08, The authors, affiliates and their subsidiary companys accept no responsability for any coherence in the above or any aforementioned or prior correspondance. The above opinion may contain information unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs. | |
| | | SchmInKY
Posts: 1,347
Comments: 0
Join Date: Aug 2006 |
11-01-06
Se we can never prove that the will to observe is/is not affecting the observed b/c someone will always have to be there to measure it.
Re: affecting temperature with the mind- I have read that through meditation one can change the temperature in one's extremities by controlling heart rate/blood flow to those areas, but I'm afraid "I'd have to see it to believe it" when it comes to boiling water, etc. | |
| | | Brain Candy
Posts: 3,873
Gallery:
0
Comments: 0
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: A paddy in Engerland.... Zodiac Sign:
Aquarius
|
11-02-06
Quote:
Originally Posted by InKY Se we can never prove that the will to observe is/is not affecting the observed b/c someone will always have to be there to measure it. | Exactly, it's the perfect circular arguement Quote:
Re: affecting temperature with the mind- I have read that through meditation one can change the temperature in one's extremities by controlling heart rate/blood flow to those areas, but I'm afraid "I'd have to see it to believe it" when it comes to boiling water, etc. | I'm with you on that one, probably for different reasons. 
I've seen people do pretty amazing things but the ammount of energy required to boil even a small volume of water isn't small, I'd be interested to see where that energy came from.
© Feroluce™ 2001-08, The authors, affiliates and their subsidiary companys accept no responsability for any coherence in the above or any aforementioned or prior correspondance. The above opinion may contain information unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs. | |
| | | Registered User
Posts: 3
Gallery:
0
Comments: 0
Join Date: Oct 2006 |
11-02-06
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefr0g No, most of them are whale women. Just like most goth girls. Fat girls usually have to do something to stand out and get the attention that pretty girls get just by entereing a room. | I beg to differ, I personally know many beautiful people that are Wiccans/Witches, and I dont mean beautiful on the outside either. | |
| | | Brain Candy
Posts: 3,873
Gallery:
0
Comments: 0
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: A paddy in Engerland.... Zodiac Sign:
Aquarius
|
11-03-06
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackHeart1014u ,and I dont mean beautiful on the outside either. | Erm.. 
Is that aveiled insult or a mistype?
© Feroluce™ 2001-08, The authors, affiliates and their subsidiary companys accept no responsability for any coherence in the above or any aforementioned or prior correspondance. The above opinion may contain information unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs.
Last edited by Feroluce : 11-03-06 at 09:54.
| |
| | | Brain Candy
Posts: 3,873
Gallery:
0
Comments: 0
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: A paddy in Engerland.... Zodiac Sign:
Aquarius
|
11-03-06
The thing about religions is that there isn't a requirement that you be attractive or ugly.
Saying that all wiccans are ugly is pretty much the same as saying that all accountants wear glasses. A totally unfounded generalisation.
© Feroluce™ 2001-08, The authors, affiliates and their subsidiary companys accept no responsability for any coherence in the above or any aforementioned or prior correspondance. The above opinion may contain information unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs. | |
| | | SchmInKY
Posts: 1,347
Comments: 0
Join Date: Aug 2006 |
11-03-06
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feroluce The thing about religions is that there isn't a requirement that you be attractive or ugly. | And that acceptance is what draws the wackos. | |
| | | Ooglemagthorpe
Posts: 5,590
Gallery:
0
Comments: 0
Join Date: Sep 2000 |
11-04-06
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackHeart1014u I beg to differ, I personally know many beautiful people that are Wiccans/Witches, and I dont mean beautiful on the outside either. |
Im sure they're fatties with hearts of gold. | |
| | | paraphiliac
Posts: 24,202
Comments: 3
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the Big Sky Country Zodiac Sign:
Leo
Rating:
| nice to see you Mistter!, my gosh i missed you! -
11-08-06
Quote:
Originally Posted by InKY Maybe someone can clarify for me: people often state that observing particles changes their action (or vibration, or something); when we studied this situation way back in Physics class, it was the presence of the electrically charged particals in the observer coming close to the observed particles that affected them, not the actual decision to observe. Is the afore-mentioned statement a misunderstanding of the actual nature of the affect on the particles, or have I missed something? | say what?
i don't know much about quantum physics, but oodles about the various forms of magick out there, and like anything else left to personal belief...it's just that, belief shaped by the power of the mind, the problem is that people seem to mix "psychic ability" with supernatural ideals...waht's to say there's anything supernatural about it at all, does anyone know what the human mind is capable of?
in my opinion, at the point when quantum physics can prove the existance of what, most term as "magick" it's no longer anything supernatural, but scientific theory, at the point it becomes duplicatable(wrd?)by other physicists, it's scientific fact.
buddhist monks have been able to regulate their body heat, resisting frigid environments! mind or magick?
no external influences involved. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | |
| | | Brain Candy
Posts: 3,873
Gallery:
0
Comments: 0
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: A paddy in Engerland.... Zodiac Sign:
Aquarius
|
11-08-06
There is scientific proof of mind over body. Placebo
© Feroluce™ 2001-08, The authors, affiliates and their subsidiary companys accept no responsability for any coherence in the above or any aforementioned or prior correspondance. The above opinion may contain information unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs. | |
| | | SchmInKY
Posts: 1,347
Comments: 0
Join Date: Aug 2006 |
11-08-06
"duplicable", and it's nice to see you again.
I'm still not convinced. There was an awful lot of vague language in that article, and it wouldn't take much heat at all to cause steam in 40 degree weather. Also, how could slowing the metabolism cause an increase in heat? I haven't found anything else on the net corroborating this or giving other examples either.
*juts out lower lip of stubbornness* | |
| | | paraphiliac
Posts: 24,202
Comments: 3
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the Big Sky Country Zodiac Sign:
Leo
Rating:
| i've been consumed by guildwars... -
11-09-06
Quote:
Originally Posted by InKY "duplicable", and it's nice to see you again.
I'm still not convinced. There was an awful lot of vague language in that article, and it wouldn't take much heat at all to cause steam in 40 degree weather. Also, how could slowing the metabolism cause an increase in heat? I haven't found anything else on the net corroborating this or giving other examples either.
*juts out lower lip of stubbornness* | http://www.uri-geller.com/content/research/twgm.htm http://www.uri-geller.com/express.htm
there are examples of people doing amazing things, the little mother somehow managing to lift a car off her trapped children sort of stories...the poltergeist infested house with an angsty pubescent teen in the household, that's what makes these things fascinating, not that they can be proven without a doubt, but the human mind does thigns that no one can explain...the problem is that most entangle these, phenomena as something magickal...attributing supernatural forces when it's really just a human mind no one knows completely.
video! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NExoT38sjj4
what people to realize is that most of these are monks who've been studying a detachment from the material world, meditating on higher aspects of humanit on the top of obscure mountains...not young "magick" children who watch a few episodes of charms, a litle winks, a few books and suddenly they're an uber powerful witch bending the very forces of nature themselves...with so much out there, how does anyone know exactly what they are bending? To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | |
| | | SchmInKY
Posts: 1,347
Comments: 0
Join Date: Aug 2006 |
11-09-06
"one child", "a girl", "scientistss say", "a group of American academics"- where are the specifics? The second article begins with a claim of "a group of people controlling objects with nothing other than the power of thought" but turns out to be about influencing a sequence of numbers generated by a computer, and there are no statistics cited. As for the balancing monk, he was the only one in the world to do it, and he balanced against a wall- a unique physical ability, but not a supernatural one. I'm going to look for an article published in actual scientific journal. | |
| | | paraphiliac
Posts: 24,202
Comments: 3
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the Big Sky Country Zodiac Sign:
Leo
Rating:
|
11-13-06
i still think "magick" is more human based and less supernatural.
don't get me wrong, i've seen things that are not humanly possible, and there are unexplained supernatural mysteries out there, but what humans can do on a supernatural level?
it's all derived from their mind. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | |
| | |