If you ever ask a religious person to prove to you that their religion is reality, they will most probably point towards their heart and say that they "feel" it. I want to know if any of your brainwashed heads have anything else to say besides you "feeling" it in your heart...

Sigh. Is it possible that your MTV-degenerated mind might wrap itself around the definition of the word "faith"? As in act of "faith"? Taking something on "faith"? Keeping the "faith"? Etc.? If you could prove religion, it wouldn't be religion, it would be science.

prove to me that the center of the earth isn't made of a giant chocolate fudge sundae. mmmmm yummy

not every religious person will agree with you there, dark messiah... some religious people think they have valid arguements againt non-believers and think that they can prove their religion to them by taking out "facts" from their fiction books like the bible and the quran etc.

if you arent one of these people, i suggest you take your brainwashed, unliberated mind and reply to other threads on other forms that are better suitable to your intelligence level

it can and has been proved... and chocolate dudge sundae, yeah i agree mmmmm yummy

Is that unliberated, or inebriated?

care to cite any sources?

unliberated

sure...
http://www.seismo.unr.edu/ftp/pub/lo.../interior.html

so are you admitting that direct observation is not needed to convince you that something exists?

You ain't gonna get proof. You're asking for an answer to the ultimate question. It's like asking someone to tell you the color of the wind.


They're wrong.

no, but i will admit that direct observation is not necessarily needed to convince me that something exists because there are some things which science cant prove at this point of time and therefore i need direct observation among other things to convince myself that something my senses does not pick does exist...

by the way, there is direct observation of the earth's crust on that website url i gave you

thats the point im trying to make. the wind does not have a color and the world does not have a god

NON-BELIEVER: prove to me that god exists
BELIEVER: why dont you prove to me that god doesnt exist?
NON-BELIEVER: because you cant declare the existance of god until you dont have proof of his existence

but i still enjoy hearing religious people's arguements on this question... i get amused by the kind of agruements they put forth and find entertainment in disproving their "valid scientific-supported facts" which they take out of their fiction religious books

so religious people, keep pouring in the arguements

My belief is just my opinion on the unknown. Until science explains the unknown I will continue to believe whatever theory I find the most plausible.

but what if there is no unknown in the first place? say, for example, there is a wall, your on one side of it and you believe there is a ball on the other side... you believe this because this theory seems to be the most logical to you... now what if there is no wall in the first place?

the non-scientific definition of a theory is an assumption based on limited information or knowledge; a conjecture...

so your "theory" on god is nothing but illusion: you have no limited information or knowledge in the first place about god...

bottom line: you're just fooling yourself, like the majority of society

how arrogant of you to presume that the majority of society are fooling themselves, how narrow not to accept that others have beliefs that differ from your own (or your apparent lack of them)

If there was no unknown then I would know and not theorize.I would see it there or not as I would with my beliefs if I knew all that there is.

You`re thinking of theory as conjecture alone and not as speculation.I never claimed any proof, in fact I called it a unknown admitting that I have none to give and I need none to give.

Bottom line: I havent even told you my faith and you`re assuming everything.

Yeah, basically, you're still an MTV-addled degenerate mind.

it doesnt matter what your faith is... you cant theorize on something of which you dont have any information or knowledge about...

all i "assumed" was that you have a faith, which was based on the fact that you quoted yourself as saying, "I will continue to believe whatever theory I find the most plausible."... that quote in its context indicates that you indeed have a faith... and if you dont, you need to learn how to express yourself more clearly