How did you expect me to react when you told me to 'get the fuck out of here'?

Did I care?

You obviously cared enough to respond when I made a comment about it.

No, that doesn't mean that I cared how you'd react. It meant that I felt like making fun of you, so I did. This is the Internet, not your pathetic "IRL" existence. Deal with my nauseating apathy.

I think I'm the only one who caught FuckDoll's George Michael reference.

Anyway, I disagree with ArSiNiK on the whole attraction/attachment thing. Which can be expected, since he and I clearly have different perspectives on sexuality. See, for me, I can't even be physically attracted to someone unless they have something else with it. Like, I can't just look at a picture of a man and be like, 'Oh billy!' There has to be something more than looks-- and it doesn't need to be major. It can be something as simple as the way they carry themselves or the way they're dressed that makes me think, 'Gee, there's something interesting/special about him. I'd like to know more about him.'

And don't tell me I contradict myself with the looks and clothes thing. The way one dresses oneself is quite indicative of one's personality and whatforth. Bite me!

THANK YOU! And might I add it's absolutly lovley to see you around here again duchess.

Really? You make me blush.

Sex is natural, sex is good. Not everybody does it, but everybody should.

And 29 is nothing, FuckDoll. Mae West didn't even begin her screen career until she was 40 and she was fucksexy.

yay, I still have a chance! (Though I must say I prefer Betty Page to Mae West)

I dont know what you look like >FuckDoll< but Im sure you are "hawt"

and I know you are loverly Duchess


pretty ladies I get to converse with

lol... oh the pics of me that have been posted here....

(there is a highly distorted pic of me in my profile)

or a non distorted one here: http://deviantcircle.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=556

that a hint for me to go searching?

this thread was about being on the market and ended up a debate on sex?
on darkforum? what?

i'm not exactly sure how i feel compared to whom that has posted previous, except to say: it's possible to have sex with someone you're not attracted to.
it sucks. don't do it. yeah, it was that "personal" level thing.
if it's their personality you're attracted to, that's not a physical thing. don't make it physical. you'll screw it up.

the rest is more of an opinionated stance. bein a reserved sucker, i've heard that when you save it for someone that really means something to you, and you're attracted to in the same breath, it's best.
and when you share it with the same person, uh.. practice makes perfect.
i'll wait for that rather than create a residue of competition for someone i'd share my life with.

nah... luckily I think they have all been erased by database errors.

I fink I sawd one...

you's a purdy one FD

Somebody on DF prefers Betty Page over someone else? LIES!

shush.

weee like bettieeee, weee like bettieeeeeeeeee. nyah nyah

i hate when people say that they're saving themselves for 'that special person.' it's like saying you won't drive a car to work until you find 'that perfect car.' how the hell are you going to know the difference between one car or the next unless you fucking drive a few??!!!?!?!?!111!!!1

there should be a level of competition with the people you're with. if the person you're with doesn't knock your socks off and rule ten times more than the other chicks you've been with, then why the fuck would you be with her? you're just wasting your time otherwise.

...are those them red hot chili peppers style socks?