Quote:
|
first of all you contradict yourself every next line of writing you type , furthermore are you implying that i'm of the notion that such philisophical discussion took place ? the answer is NO if you take some time to read , i prompted the savy philisophical vigilant to make one of this post giving his conditions of qualification , instead of just bitching . Then i questioned his reasons to bring such absence to notice, in search of confirmation , and pointed lack of stronger philosophical orientation as a reason since the post was not oriented to iniciate a philisophical discussion (promote
|
i did not contradict myself, for there is no specific philosophical inguiry, merely subjective philosophical inquires, which i granted, therefore i did not contradict myself....
to better explain, there is no specific philosophical theory in this thread, but there is now a philosophical inquiry as to whether or not there is any philosophical inquiry....understand?
also, i will grant you that i might not have had the full comprehension of your previous post, but like you i was exclaiming that there is a philosophical inquiry if we wish one, despite there not being a specific one.....
also, if you are going to make me feel somewhat (for lack of a better word) ignorant, although i am sure you did not mean to do so, but because i am firm believer in emotions, or as i like to declare as also as a reality behind things, i feel subjected to respond that if i could not of had the comprehension of your previous post then perhaps you should speak in more lament terms....i am not trying to attack you, merely retalliate
however, i like your rationale.....just can't understand it fully yet.....