You`d be good in your eyes and bad in mine in that single aspect but at least neither of us would be indifferent.
A extremly sadistic human being would do whats right in their eyes, looking out for their own pleasure at the expense of others but that will be (rightly imo) stopped by most "good" people from doing so.
If that person isnt a person and is a country or a religion instead (doing supposed immoral things localy not interationaly)through we are reconmended not to pass judgement on them by our own standards because its all relitive.


"Humans rights is not a monoploy of the west"

However true that sentance maybe in alowing the freedom of other countries is it a just freedom?