The article WOULD'VE been about that if it hadn't been bookended with the out-of-context quote at the beginning and the statements in the last two paragraphs. He takes an article that really has nothing to do with Obama and paints it to be otherwise, and that's the point.

Note that I also discredited the author's example of the Vietnamese people in New Orleans, which is so ridiculous that I can't even believe he tried to draw the comparison.

Irregardless was not in the article, I was kidding around with Dy.

Are there some blacks who have a sense of entitlement? Sure. Are whites demonized by some blacks? You know it. Actually, I remeber when Bill Cosby was crucified by the African-American community for saying the same thing - when he essentially said that there are black people who impose segregation upon themselves because of various factors like those ones we're talking about. He was right for sure. But an article entitled "Obama's Anger" and bookended with quotes from or statements about him his most certainly attempting, however poorly, to be about Barack Obama.