Quote:
Originally Posted by darklingmiss Any time you study history, you have to remember that each source, even the primary sources that these authors are drawing from, are all written by people. So objective history is like doublethink. It doesn't really exist except for in terms, and even those are contradictory. Only way to conclusively know what happened would be to have been there at the time. |
True, but in the case of the book I was refering to, they took the documented physical ailments caused by the "witchcraft" and approached it through medical diagnostics. The doctors consulted weren't told anything but the symptoms, and they all fall under the perview of encephalitis. There are environmental elements that support the theory as well.
The downside to the book is that the author doesn't give any real treatment or due to any of the more traditional views of what happened.