Quote:
Originally Posted by Iron's Rite For this line of discussion, it will be nesscessary to disregard all discussion of the ethical concerns over rather or not individual wars have been right or wrong. What I wish to examine is the possibility that agressive impulses can be satiated on a national level by participation as an aggressor in a major war. Examples of this hypothesis can be seen in many nations, primarily those that participated in WWII under the axis nations of Germany and Japan. After commiting horrendous attrocities under the Third Reich and in Nanking respectively; both of these nations are now thoroughly commited to international peace and non-agression. England was also a colonial power for years; we see the same effect: Even English Comedian Eddie Izzard took note of this, recommending in one of his sketches that Germany and Japan be recruited as a special "Peace Squad."
Do you agree with this hypothesis? If so, how do we explain nations that act as exceptions to this hypothesis? |
Every nation is capable of aggressive impulses, even modern Germany and Japan, with a suitable application of aggressive nationalism, which is different from normal nationalism. Japan channeled its nationalist spirit into commerce. The rest of Europe is so paranoid about Germany, post-Hitler, that anytime a nationalist pops his head up, he gets beat down(rhetorically).
One thing that could prevent any European nation from going back down this road is the dilution of the native populations. Unlike America, European nationalism is based on the way they percieve their connection to their land. It goes beyond the concept of race, and is almost a familial thing. With the influx of muslim immigrants, and the migration of European labor that the E.U. has facilitated, it's highly unlikely that we'll see anything like the Third Reich or British Empire ever again. Not because they "got it out of their system", but because the thing that makes traditional European nationalism possible has been broken.
Russia is a bit different. They have the same "blood and soil" thing as the rest of Europe, while they are also an ideological empire in the same way that America is, but the opposite, and their aggressive nationalist tendencies come and go in the same way.
Japan is only "commited to international peace and non-agression" because they aren't currently threatened by anyone but N. Korea, and it's good for business. I wouldn't be surprised if Japan and Australia are building up nuclear arsenals in the next 20 years(with American assistance) to form a regional counterweight to China and Indonesia.
I'll try to make this more coherent tomorrow, I'm stoned and tired.