Quote:
Originally Posted by StygianEyes  Sustainability is a great idea, yay for smartly doing things. I'm a conservationalist, i believe in doing things the best way for the situation, not a preservationalist which says DO NOT TOUCH YOU PLANT RIPPER OUTERS! YE SCUM OF EARTH HOW DARE YOU TOUCH NATURE!
So, sure that's a good idea and maybe the article has some good points. But i'm taking a stance of do you want to be taken seriously? If you want people who will blindly believe the rant of a person who things they have all the answers then cool, stay like that.
If you want an informed public who value reputability of an article then you need to find some f-ing sources for your completely unsupported claims. You use "if and then" arguements without supporting any of your basic claims, expecting your audience to assume they are true, blindly. Its bullshit rantings until then.
Sooo many logical fallacies in it too, nice little slippery slope of people becoming machines, s/he leaves only one option as the future result of actions. It's an analytical nightmare and a mess. |
You do not understand the article... idiot.
He or she is not trying to prove ANYTHING to you... it is TELLING YOU.
Only you are too misinformed to understand what the article says.
because youHAVE NO EDUCATION
You HAVE NO FACTS
You do not understand ANYTHING because you have never studied ANYTHING in your short ignorant lazy spoiled life.
If you ever decide to LEARN what the actual facts are: then you will have to get off your lazy ass and do your OWN HOMEWORK.
Then you can come back and agree that what is stated in this article is 100% CORRECT.
This article is not trying to 'prove' anything.
YOU are so STUPID that you think that the facts have to be SOLD to you.
All that you have ever been sold on is LIES.
You are an arrant spoiled retard... and will stay that way for the rest of your frustrated life... UNLESS you start LEARNING.