it's false for the reasons i gave in my post. plus, several of your statements were false, several were true.

i might be a fascist. doesn't mean i might not be be right.

if you say my last statement makes that clear, so be it.

i may be.

if stalin killed millions to preserve his society, then yes, he was acting as a good leader should. whether he could have found a better way to do it is the domain of ethics, not morals.

society is more important than one family, two families, a million families.

if hitler killed jews to preserve his society, he acted justly.

haha, i like how you try to force me into a trap by comparing me to stalin and saying i agree with hitler. what if they chose the wrong means to their ends? or what if their ends did not coincide with society's? either way they could be viewed as wrong from my moral standpoint as well as your wishy washy ethical one. hindsight is 20/20. somehow i doubt though that they chose the right means (stalin) or the right end (hitler)

really, name calling is for pussies and people who've run out of arguments. i'm guessing you're both.