not for nothing but what do you think a common ancestor implies, its not as if that anscestor was unape/monkey like, whos talking about monekys anyway?

you right science cant have an opinion, opinion's arent science, it certainly is possible for science to create a theory for the existince of god, finding supporting evidence for that theory is a problem, which is pretty much why its still debatable, the existence of god that is. On the other hand people that do science can have an opinion one that can be used to support a hyposthsis based upon that indivduals expertise

"You cannot disprove it so its not in the realm of science", what? So the theory of relativity isnt science. This statement is also a direct contradiction to the three previous sentences of your post.

Science is used to explain how things work once they are around us? What about the things that were never around us but theorized to exist and then latter discovered, anti-matter for example, so a valid assumption is that the evidence of gods existence hasnt been discovered. I can not think of anything better to eventually prove the existence of god then the scienetific method. That is if it can be proven.