can a unit of measure be subjective?

how do you know your are made for something unless you have tried everyting?

is a bomb a perfect way to kill people? is the intent of a bomb to kill people?

can a bomb kill people? true

if i intend to kill 1000 people and drop a bomb to do it and only 500 die was that bomb perfect?

Do we spend billions to make a bombs better? yes, how can you improve on perfection?

are there alternatives that maybe more effective then a bomb to kill people? yes, why would you use something else if a bomb was perfect?

I have typed all this bomb crap to demonstrate to you that being made for something is far from being perfect, if it was we would not make any changes to or replace that perfect thing with something else. For example I dont see alot of people driving steam engines to work.

There are certainly alternative's to the existing standards those being diffrent standards

you say we should not try to do the impossible why then should we set are standards to impossible goals?

I did not say we should not have standards by the way, there seems to be some confusion so I just wanted to clear that up.

your last paragraph makes no sense but it scares me to think that you would simply accept and not question something that has no comparable data and no supporting evidence. Assume for a moment someone told you that humans could fly wouldnt you want to see some proof.

if an individual did not believe in something and was faced with a situation that challenged that belief wouldnt that by defintion cause them to fall back on believing in something?