if the terrorists wanted to negotiate maybe they would have tried that in the first place? i mean, if somebody's mad at me and they talk to me, i don't fight them, but if they walk up and kick me in the nuts i'm not gonna sit and talk to them dude. what the fuck? and us killing islam would prove we deserve to live more. end of story. fuck morals, fuck ethics, it's right by might, ladies and gentlemen. and we should kill all muslims because all muslims pose a potential threat. by your argument a terrorist that hasn't actually killed anyone doesn't deserve anything. he's done nothing wrong! he's as innocent as you or i. but he has the potential to harm others. i say let any muslims that really want to live come live in concentration camps for a few generations and get rid of the rest. then let the muslims loose when we're more sure we can trust them. or keep them there, like indians in a reservation. let them choose whether they want to live in captivity or die. i mean, life's life, and they could even have a large degree of freedom as long as they were under our thumb. this being the alternative to annihilation. personally i'd just kill em all. that's the philosophy they have towards us, too. it's a philosophy that makes sense. if you think someone threatens your way of life, eliminate them. we threaten theirs, and they threaten ours as a result. we should take care of them before they do away with us. neither group has to be right or wrong, it's just a fight for survival. and no, we can't all get along forever. but rest assured if we had killed every german, italian, and japanese man, woman and child, had eradicated the spaniards, southerners, and english, there would be far fewer people alive today and our security would increase as a direct result. imagine all the wars we won on foreign soil: what if they were all dead? america has never lost to a foreign 'aggressor', and hence has never truly been at risk of annihilation. imagine the face of the planet if all wars were fought to annihilation. wouldn't it be a simpler, better place? i think so.

btw isn't truce just what both sides agree on when one side knows they can't annihilate the other? otherwise why not go for the gold? i believe we have what it takes to kill a good portion of the earth's population in under a decade.