Quote:
So you readily evince the knowledge that opposites do exist??
If so and they do exist one cannot say that they do not exist, hence my earlier argument.
|
WHAT?! At what point did anything I say ever warrant that opposition didn't exist?! I never said that!
Just because I accept the fact that there is opposition, doesn't declare opposition as a Truth! I also accept empirical observations, but they're not a Truth! I also accept metaphysics, but even it isn't a Truth! I also accept 2 + 2 = 4, but that's not a Truth! So how does my stating something isn't a Truth dictate my thinking that it doesn't exist?
And to go back...
What is the opposite of a triangle? I understand triangle without understanding its opposite. If indeed opposition is the subject of the whole, then how is it I can understand a subject without the whole? Or is it your theory that subjects matter not?
I don't quite fully understand your confusion or acceptance on any matter. Just because opposition does exist doesn't mean it's all that exists! Doesn't mean it's all that's relevant! If it were, if indeed opposition was the Truth, then why are we even questioning anything? Why are we still here for that matter?
Quote:
So lets see where we are. Have we established that polarity does exist within the universe and is apparent??
If so can we also establish that from what we know of physics that if something occurs in nature that the chances of it occuring again are very high????
|
So what? What's the point? Speakers exists...doesn't mean they're everywhere. Doesn't mean speakers is a Truth.
But in the end, and no offense, I'm getting rather tired of this discussion because it's leading us nowhere. Say what you want, argue as you will, but if you (who are so readily to accept science) can't warrant that as long as the validity of a theory is flawed, and forever will be flawed, limits its justification in an argument, any argument, then arguing with you is just inane.