Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dyshade People like DM love to enter an argument and place burden when they seemingly have not even read the thread. Sic proposed the theory that opposition is a flawed theory and as such I asked him to invalidate opposition utilizing the words of those that have gone before if he so wishes and I will play happy devils advocate again so we have some enthralling discussion  |
You really, truly seem to love being completely wrong about things. Saying a theory is wrong is not the same as proposing a new theory of the Universe, for the simple reason that it's generally not falsifiable. Sic can, and has, listed things that have no opposites, but as you will to half-assed evasions on how we simply don't
know if those things have an opposite yet, nothing can be conclusively proven. As the being advocating a semi-falsifiable position, the burden of proof is on you to actually honest to God demonstrate how and why things are based upon opposition, rather than casually dismissing any possibility of illogic in your statement with, "One thing that you folks seem to misunderstand quite frequently is that everything that is a whole is only that way because of its opposing parts all the way down to molecules and atoms". You're using deductive logic to make an assumption that everything is based around opposites, and using that assumption to try and prove itself.