Wow, i had time to start reading it, answer a phone call, talk on the phone and read at the same time, finish my conversation and still not be done.. Haha.

Anyway, i think the word soul can have its own meaning, set apart from commonalities with other words that describe the human being, only in religion. The philosophical and theological definitions seem to branch from "soul" just existing and being an "easy way out explanation" that is seemingly backed by logic. Why does this happen the way it does? Well the soul, silly. But what is the soul? Well its the reason this happens, duh. Im not implying that some semblance of a soul exists in these two views but religiously it has more of its own definition. So, all in all, is a soul, just a soul that is there?

Yay for circular logic?