Instead of quoting sic's(that would take another page), ill just refer to his post.

I can see where youre coming from, but y cant it have a defintion? thats like saying that "mean" or "pathetic" or "sad" or any other word that refers to the human nature as just "existing." So since these have all been defined, is it not right that "evil" and "love" and "good" can be defined? Not only have many people written books about the said question, but im sure many discussions have taken place. Ive never thought about how maybe it just "exists" and yet is not defined.

To all those that talk about perception, i am very aware, that yes, it does rely on that, but imo there exists a very strong definition(for lack of a better word) that may exist in all cultures for the above said words.

Maybe it doesnt have to mean "bad", but just "outside societal standards?"