i don't adopt any explanation......all are wrong, but all have there points.....

science fails for the simple reason that most modern sciences (especially physical sciences) refuse to accept any theories pertaining to the metaphysical......i find it hypocritical and ignorant for them to do so.....speaking in terms of evidence, there's enough to suggest the metaphysical exists in some form or manner......hell, even their "Big-Bang" theory contains some metaphysical reasoning behind it.....not that the "Big-Bang" didn't happen, but the truth of the matter is, philosophically speaking (even science goes by this), "something" can't come from "nothing".......philosophically speaking, it is impossible and logically invalid to conceive of nothing/non-existence.......what's more, i personally believe that science is nothing more than religion

religious views (such as Deism, or any other) also fail because most don't adhere to one key concept......that perhaps said "creator" was not in any shape or form sentient.........believers of any religion don't really like the idea that their "creator" was/is incapable of any thought (specifically concerning itself)

which is why i go more with the philosophical view that perhaps said creator is indeed metaphysical (like religions says it is) and that perhaps it is infinite (science) and not sentient in any form (philosophy)........perhaps EXISTENCE has always been, but the physical reality (as we know it) was simply result of motion (time, for instance.....the "big-bang")