<<how do you know that? have you dug up every square in of earth and confirmed this?>>

We know this because of foresnsic data and evidence.

<<who knows, their may be a lost civilisation beneath the sea, which dates back 40,000 years.>>

No, not likely. They would have left ruins. Or Fossils. If youre thinking about the aryan version of Atlantis I wouldnt bother, its a myth and was said to be based on a small settlement in Southern Spain. And 40,000 - 60,000 years ago, humans were just comming out of Africa and spreading into the Middle East, and Europe was controlled by Neaderthal. We simply hadnt spread far enough out yet. How do we know? Because of foresic evdence. Again the oldest human remains all come from the middle east and Africa. Which means we came from Africa nott some secret splinter group of humans in the ocean. And there is no evidence of an island or whatever sinking into the ocean in the last 50,000 years.

<<again, how do you know this is a fact? have you checked?>>

Have I checked personally? Well no... ive been busy. But I assure you I have top men on it and they all said it was as such.

<<again, how do you know?>>

I have a crystal ball, and I personally collected all the forensic evidence for it.

<<Imagine living 20,000 years ago in a country called the 'Black Land', and all of a sudden the ice barrier which kept back the water from the med, just suddenly melted and gave way. And imagine the water rushed in from the med, destroying immediately the 'civilisation' and forced the people to abandon the 'Black Land' and head for Europe. Then imagine the 'Black Land' continued to fill up with water over many hundreds of years, thus creating what we now called the 'Black Sea'.>>

I cant imagine it, mostly because ice doesnt "suddenly" melt. It melts over time, especially glaciers and ice caps and entire countries under the ice. Barring all that, you have a huge hole. If this was such an advanced society why didnt they resume thier culture elsewhere? Before the Greeks colonised the Area around the black sea its shores were said to be the home of very barbaric and uncivilized tribes.

Besides the Ryan-Pitman Deluge Theory (great flood) says that even if that WAAS the case it happend only 7000 years ago. Which would mean that there was already tribes and civilizations all over the world, including the Americas and Europe to explain your mudhuts and dirt mounds. This theory has largely been debunked anyway.

The black land? ummm the Black sea was named in the 13th century. Why would we call it the black land?

<<Now i'm not saying this is FACT, but imagine if this was true, then it's very possible that a civilisation buried underneath the 'Black Sea' (if their is one) could be very well an earlier civilisation than the ones in Egypt or Sumer, couldn't they?>>

I doubt it, again the Ryan-Pitman Deluge Theory has been pretty much debunked. It is more likely that the black sea grew slowly OVER TIME because of the numerous rivers running into it (including the danube) as well as the slow melting ice of the glaciers from Frozen Europe during the last ice age. It has always been a lake, which was just given a boost by weather, rivers and an ice age.

See heres where I think you should take your argument.

Its clear that you dont like the idea of Life beggining in Africa or the Middle east (jew land). And that is why you want to desperatly believe in "black land". But why dont you want people comming form Africa? because youre white obviously. But white isnt a race unto itself. White people/Europeans are technically the same race as Jews, Arabs and Egyptians. Caucasoids. You should take your argument to that level and I feel you will look less crazy and even score a few wins in the process.