Yeah, Bush seemed like a bumbling moron, what else is new? The man can barely give public speeches, how do you think he's gonna do in a live debate?

Overall, though, I think he went into more detail. A lot of Kerry's responses seemed to be very blunt answers with no depth or explaination on how he proposed to acheive his goals. One minute he's talking about how we need a backdoor draft and aren't allowing troops to leave the service, the next minute he says he's adding more special forces groups and two more regiments to the Army, as if he's going to somehow magically pull them out of his ass.

One minute he says we're over extended, the next that we need to supply more aid, again, with this magical ass Army of his.

Bush is slow, but contrary to everyone complaining about how bad things are in America, I haven't seen any evidence of it, no one I know has lost a job or is having trouble making ends meet. The war in Iraq was poorly planned for, but I think the war itself was neccisary. Ultimately, I trust Bush's judgement more than Kerry's and I think what Bush said about needing a president who is not frequently changing positions to inspire trust and dependability (but not dependency) is very true.

George Washington was known for being a very slow witted man. When he needed to make decisions, he often took his time with it. However, even his opponents were willing to admit that when he had finally made a decision, it was in the nation's best interests. I feel this way about Bush a lot of the time.