Quote:
|
Originally Posted by thefinalw0rd Zell Miller...well...after his speech Wolf Blitzer said that he seemed very angry during his talk...and Zell said "No, I was not. I'm sorry if that's the impression that I gave."
Then on Hardball he as much as challenged Chris Matthews to a duel.
This guy is wacko, 100%. I don't think I can count on my fingers the amount of times that Bush refered to American troops in Iraq as an occupying force, and Zell attacks Kerry for the same choice of words. There are some things he said that I actually do agree with...but a lot of his words...I don't know... |
He had to deny it because being angry is something politicians aren't supposed to do. Of course he's angry. He's seventy something years old, and he's watching the party he's been a lifelong member of go right down the shitter.
If wanting to kick a journalist's ass makes one a wacko, then you can call me that too.
Quote:
|
The problem is that Republicans have become more conservative in the past four years, and the Democrats more liberal to counter it. When both were fairly moderate, bi-partisan things could happen, but not with it like this. The one at the source is the Bush administration. He is responsible for the neo-cons that pushed the Republicans further to the right than is probably good...and therefore he is responsible for the balancing move for the democrats of becoming more liberal than before.
|
You've got to be kidding me. Aside from the tax cuts, Bush IS a liberal. I don't feel like listing all the liberal things he's done right this minute, it would take too long. Neo-cons are NOT more conservative that the average republican. They are pro-war liberals. The republican party is drifting so far to the left that a lot of conservatives might not vote this year.