eh....you're taking point A and turning it into point B......the topic of discussion is goverments and communities, etc.....not man grabbing child to protect the bullet.....even thatz not the issue, as it clearly appears that the man with the gun has the might and right over the man without a gun....even if he does use a child for protection

the point is, someone will always be on top....history has shown us that this is the case.....and it should be......but the question is who? better more liberal's call the shots than back-assward child rapin' sand-fuckers

also, army doesn't necessarily make might these days....economy does....thatz how we are able to remain as a hyper-power....our economy and political structure keeps us at top.....however, china is coming up awfuly fast.......they have the largest army in the world, prove communism can work, and their economy is swelling enormously......