Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dgg9 That's because most of them are in basic political agreement. Naturally, if the majority all agree that Bush is Hitler and the war was for a pipeline, and so on down the party line, there will be harmony.
Translation: our political POV is different than yours. That's the bottom line. |
I can disagree with someone while accepting their opinion as valid, when its their opinion, I have no idea what your opinions are, political or otherwise, you're a troll, you could be doing it for a laugh (like I was in my parody).
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dgg9 Indeed, a fair observer looking at your output recently would conclude YOU were trolling. You can call "disagreement with a fair amount of heat" trolling. Fine. But that goes both ways. But apparently you are unable to see that the adversarial nature went both ways. Any neutral observer can easily read through these threads and see the abuse coming from your side too.
For you to paint this as one-sided trolling is to lose any real credibility. |
Yes, a fair observer would say that, because I was running a parody of your posts, which are all trolls (lately anyway, I remember I did have a decent debate with you before you started the trolling proper, but then Lawson and RedHawk were starting to actually have action taken against them, so you started trolling). Yes it was one-sided trolling until I did the same.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dgg9 No, what we really have here are a majority who enjoy the fact that they basically agree with each other, and want to use the banning mechanism to stifle dissent. Of course, that's the moderators' privilege, but don't pretend for one second it would be anything other than that. |
We don't all agree with each other, however, we aren't trolls, so we don't just dismiss each others arguements by saying 'non sequitur' or saying its leftist even when it involves no statement that could be said to be even on that scale, let alone actually left-leaning. Since I don't actually know your political views because your trolling, I can't honestly say if I'd agree or not, I'm sure we could find some common ground if you weren't so busy making sure there isn't any.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dgg9 Just as I said: you can't handle substantive disagreement, so you clamor for the moderators to ban. |
Actually, that's the first time you said it to me. However 'non sequitur' and 'leftist' along with 'nonsense' and 'fallacy' are not substansive disagreements. Its trolling, trolling is against the rules, you've been granted leniency.