Yes. And the rest of the world did not want to be dragged in that war as I recall without the UN inspector's full results. But if you're referring to people having different sources of news: There was much scepticism over here in Europe... and that remains unchanged.

If there had been hard and unsubstantial evidence, I must ask: Why not do the politically correct thing in presenting that before the security council? The fact that the US did not do that tells me that it's evidence was sketchy at best... not enough to convince the rest of the security council to sanction a war. And so they went in on their own, dragging their "allies" in with an "if you're not with us you're against us" attitude (I believe that was a literal quote of Bush in one of his speeches).