How you derived this from what I said is beyond me. You're making assumptions and insinuations about possible meaning behind my words. I don't appreciate that. And what you wrote could be considered trolling too. Which is another point I made after Peter started saying I was patronizing. We all do it, majority of the time, how is that saying there is no trolling? I completely agreed with that and that is precisely why pure debate can't take place.

Saying that true debate is impossible on DF because it always gets derailed by personal fights is saying everyone is a dumbass? And where did I for a moment suggest people are getting their panties in a knot for no reason? If you can point out for me which of my words correlate to your statements (according to you) I can look again at what I said and again clarify that what I said was precisely what Fuckdoll said before me. Did you wish for me to completely parrot her or anyone else's words or am I allowed to say things in my own way? The title of this thread is what I agreed with, and you have a problem with that? I don't understand why.

I didn't insult you personally and yet you feel you have to take it upon yourself to defend Peter in such a way as to completely misconstrue my words. Which is PRECISELY what my point is about unbiased objective debating on DF. It's impossible, it always gets personal and the original context gets lost in the personal fights. If this wasn't an issue we wouldn't warn and ban people. We wouldn't split threads or move inappropriate posts/threads to the Deleted Forum or the Bitch forum. If every debate stayed perfectly ON topic and never veered from an objective stance we wouldn't need to do any of that, would we?