[quote=ssliasil]What Gay & Lesbian Activists Won't Tell You or Your Children: Homosexual Myths and Realities

MYTH: Homosexuality is an inborn trait. REALITY: There is no credible scientific evidence that homosexuality is a genetically-acquired trait. In fact, the tremendous variability in sexual beliefs and practices around the world suggest that sexuality is a learned or cultural part of the human condition.

However....why is it wrong if it occurs? I don't like fish however In countires where fish is the stbale I would grow to tolerate or even like it. The simple fact is, it's an acquired factor that has the self same impact with regards to your life

MYTH: Since homosexuals have no control over their homosexuality, society should accept their sexuality. REALITY: Most gay men have had sexual relations with women and many convert to heterosexuality every year. Even if all people are innately bisexual, as most radical gay/lesbian activists' claim, either normal socialization or specialized therapy and counselling have succeeded in channelling this bisexuality into heterosexuality in 70% of cases. Even if all homosexuals actually had no choice in being homosexual, this still does not automatically make their lifestyle socially or morally equivalent to heterosexuality.

Conversion....maybe people are attracted to more then just gender?

MYTH: Ten percent of people are homosexual. REALITY: This figure is based on Kinsey's fraudulent research. In fact, only between 2-4% of people are committed homosexuals or bisexuals.

This is about right, the Kinsey report was highly flawed

MYTH: Homosexuality is not a psychiatric disorder. REALITY: Though radical activists intimidated the profession to "normalize" homosexuality in 1973, 70% of psychiatrists continue to view it as a treatable pathology.

Psychiatrists could treat a lot of factors about you that you consider normal. Just because one can doens't mean one should!

MYTH: The diversity of sexual behaviour liberates people from an oppressive and compulsory heterosexuality. REALITY: Sexual promiscuity has always relegated women to a marginal social and political position. Confining sex to marriage by sanctions against premarital relations, adultery, and homosexuality has enhanced the status of women by giving them control over a scarce and highly valued "resource," their own sexuality.

Erm women being masters of their own sexual destiny is a problem?.....you mysogynist

MYTH: It doesn't or shouldn't matter, except to those directly involved, what kind of sex people engage in. REALITY: Left in a "state of nature" human culture would never have developed. The history of Western civilization has been intimately linked to the history of the channelling of human sexuality into the Judeo-Christian ideal of marital sex. Every civilized society that has failed to recognize that the naturally promiscuous human male has to be constrained by strong moral sanctions has paid the price, as our own society is now paying with growing rates of adultery, pornography, child prostitution, sexually-transmitted disease, illegitimacy, divorce, suicide, and single-parenthood.

Yet even today those who espouse the highest moral virtues are found to lead the most decadent lives free of the shakles they preach!

MYTH: Homosexuality is compatible with normal family life. REALITY: Homosexuality is a denial of one of the most important functions of family life, the perpetuation of life itself through procreation. There are some primitive societies in which homosexuality is so pervasive that population survival is maintained only by kidnapping children from neighbouring tribes.

Priests are celibate by choice, If people can live with out it, then let them. Are you equating to the westenr worlds gay men to child kidnappers?

MYTH: To discriminate against people because of their sexual preference is just like discriminating against people because of skin colour. REALITY: When Black people are discriminated against it is because of what they are; when gays are condemned it is because of what they do. Verbal or physical gay-bashing is unacceptable but this is not the same as saying that gay sex is socially and morally acceptable. It is one thing to grant homosexuals the same legal protections that other citizens have; it is another to grant them the same legal privileges (e.g., marriage) or to celebrate homosexuality as a societally desirable way to live.

If this is right, and I don't for one minute beleive it Then surely it is perfectly acceptable for me to persecute christians! Afterall it s not what you are but what you do!

MYTH: Society has no right to judge the diverse sexual practices of its citizens. REALITY: If this were true, then society would also have no right to condemn incest, paedophilia, rape necrophilia, and bestiality.


however you miss out the notion of consent! Adults can give consent, animals and minors cannot and rape victims do not. Consenting adults is a very apt term

MYTH: The homosexual lifestyle is no different from the heterosexual lifestyle. REALITY: The typical gay man has had between 300-500 sexual "partners." Many gay men have has thousands of one-time sexual encounters. Many bisexual and gay men have never kissed another man condemning such affection as sissified or vulgar.

These are true facts, but many hetro males boast about their conquests.

MYTH: Those who condemn homosexuality are homophobic bigots. REALITY: Although there is no such scientifically established pathological fear called "homophobia," this has not prevented gay and lesbian activists from misusing science in their hugely successful effort to portray those who do not support all of their demands (same-sex marriage, homosexual men permitted to be Big Brothers, etc.) as being right-wing Christian bigots simply because they do not share the activists' values. To argue that marital sex is the best arena for the expression of sexuality, is no more "homophobic" than to say that it is wrong to have sex with young boys is "paedophobic." If there is a paranoid fear, it is a terrible "liberal" anxiety of offending homosexuals by implying that their lifestyle is any less worthy of praise than the lifestyle of married people. But what about the widely-accepted lesbian activist position that: "lesbianism is the key to liberation and only women who cut their ties to male privilege can remain trusted to remain serious in the struggle against male dominance." Isn't this heterophobic bigotry?

I don't beleive that the married couple is the best arena for sexual expression I think any stable loving relationship is! Anyone who thinks sex and marriage should only be for procrative purposes, should understand that procreation is all that matters so sex is all important so compatability should be a major issue. Anyone who thinsk of it as an expression of intimacy would not have such problems

MYTH: Gay/lesbian activists speak for the majority of homosexuals. REALITY: Most homosexuals no more support a radical homosexual agenda than do heterosexuals support a radical heterosexual agenda (e.g., one based on "free love" or "group marriage"). Gay/lesbian activists therefore speak mainly to and for themselves and represent a small minority of a small minority.

All activists speak from the smallest minority standpoint. Their own perception. this is neither new nor radical

MYTH: There is no hidden "homocentric" agenda. All gay/lesbian activists want is the same protection from verbal and physical abuse as heterosexuals. REALITY: Many homosexual activists want to abolish laws governing the age of sexual congress to allow adults to have sex with "consenting" children of any age, the right that young children be taught "safe" homosexual acts in schools, the repeal of all laws against child prostitution, the right to adopt minor children, and the repeal of all laws restricting the sex or number of persons entering into a lawful marriage unit. The "Gay Rights Platform" calls for "encouragement and support for sex education courses, prepared and taught by Gay women and men, presenting homosexuality as a valid, healthy preference and lifestyle, as a viable alternative to heterosexuality."

This is utter bollocks. I'm sorry, but when someone shows me proof for this utter drivel, I'll actually respond with reeasoned debate.

MYTH: The public schools have a duty, if not a right, to teach students about sexual identity. REALITY: The public schools are a creation and reflection of society. Why should they be forced to set up a special programme to satisfy the moral-political agenda of a tiny special-interest group whose values most parents do not agree with? Public schools were established to teach literacy, numeracy, and to impart the wisdom of the ages, something many of them are not doing ver well. If so many of our schools are doing such a poor job teaching the tree Rs, how can they be trusted to impart knowledge about such a complex, politically charged, and sensitive issue as human sexuality?

Schools should edcuate their pupils to deal with the world in which their going to live. there's gay people in dem der hills!

MYTH: Winnipeg School Division No. I homosexual students are subjected to pervasive and systemic harassment. REALITY: Where is the evidence for this assertion? In fact, if there is any victimization of gays/lesbians, it is trivial compared to the daily harassment of students who are fat, short, belong to visible minorities, etc. Parents, teachers, and school board officials should continue to condemn all forms of hurtful and demeaning name-calling.

I can't agree more with this...proove your arguement or shut up.