Originally Posted by John Preston

So if a bunch of other countries are telling you to let some guys in so that they can see if you have the only weapons that you could possibly have which would allow you to bluff others into not attacking you, would you really want to?

Originally Posted by John Preston

Actually, Saddam was the only thing keeping Iraq from falling apart. A recent series of articles details how civil war is about to occur(planned by the AQ), and that now Kurds are busting into the northern area of Iraq and taking the homes of Arabs, who in turn flee out of fear of the Kurds. While Saddam might have proven to be one of the more unstable leaders ever, he kept his country running and together, not to mention didn't seem to suffer from much terrorism, and as such it would be quite plausible that he at least was allies with the AQ in such a manner that they wouldn't target his country. However, the AQ's main goal has been to draw America into the Middle East countries, which in turn would result in an increase of dislike/hatred toward America/Americans.
Look at my signature, too. I find it a tad funny

Originally Posted by John Preston

So you're saying that you're all for a country attacking another for no real reason?

Originally Posted by John Preston

and the UK had information which supported that Iraq didn't have the WMD that they supposedly did BEFORE the invasion of Iraq.

Originally Posted by John Preston

What does this all lead up to? Iraq was invaded for some reason other than what was given, and currently is suffering from a decimated infrastructure(again), Civil War is about to occur, people are being terrorized and murdered(not to mention put in prisons by American soldiers for no reason), and American soldiers are planning on setting up outside of Baghdad and will leave everything in the hands of the Iraqi police(who keep getting blown up and massacred).

Originally Posted by John Preston

Actually, the US and the UK have been using such weaponry as cluster bombs, in areas where civilians exist, and that in turn has resulted in a large amount of civilian deaths even when cluster bombs in that area are not allowed(Geneva Convention) due to the inability to discern between a civilian and military target. Also, before walking into Baghdad America conducted random bombing on the city, as was stated by a US soldier in charge of one of those cannon thingies(article from a year and fifty billion monkeys ago stated this..and no, I can't find it, yahoo seems to dump their older stuff).

Originally Posted by John Preston

...So you don't think that US is to blame for anything that they have done in their unwarranted assault on another country?