Evolution is the process of changing from one thing to another.
Mutation is the forced changing of something via an outside factor, such as radioactive crap or sunlight, or so on and so forth.

Darwin's theory is that the strongest, the most fitting or the most deserving survives and propegates.

A lot of people look at that and claim that's how evolution occurs, that Darwin's theory is all you need to explain evolution and how we came to be.

However....

The changes that occur are brought about originally by a mutation, caused in the basic DNA strands of the being.
Example:
Rodent -> Mutation -> Larger sized Rodent -> Can kill more things

So we have that, right? However if you look at the basic structure of such a thing you would realize one primary problem..there's only one rodent being changed into a larger rodent.

Darwin's theory does not explain how this occurs, Darwin's theory does not explain how changes occur and Darwin's theory is merely a basic tool of evolution, one that is extremely simplistic and unsurprising.

Let's take it all the way back to when this all started..
We have our ooze.
We shall call it Bob.
Hi bob! Yes..bob..we love you..
okay..we won't call it Bob.

Well, there's the ooze..and then something occurs which causes the basic first form of life to be made.
YES! WOO! YAY!
It's asexual and all that, all germy and bacterial. It continues to breed and breed and go and go and go..and yet there's one problem. What factor made it even start to exist in the first place? Well, during that time one would anticipate that the sunlight combined with some chemicals in the air did it, and then as it sits in that pool of ooze breeding with itself the same factors cause it to evolve again?
So..
Ooze -> Bacteria -> multi-cellular thing that isn't anything like bacteria
We're missing links here..big bad links. Something had to exist as a bridge between the bacteria and the multi-cellular beings that we have nowadays. Why? Because you can't have a single celled organism suddenly become a multi-cellular thing that can handle the environment that exists as well as be able to propegate the species. Not only would you have to have 2 bacteria evolving at roughly the same exact time but then you'd have potential incest related issues from just having 2, which means you'd have to have a huge amount of bacteria or bacteria-type entities evolving at the same time.

And then you have to also realize that from that single thing generated you'd have to evolve many many MANY more types of organisms.
How many species would you say exist in the world today? Just in terms of insects there are millions, I do believe..and then if you get into fish, mammals and so on and so forth..well..
Plus plants which have a different cellular structure than animals..

Also, one interesting thing..when plants came to be they'd be poisoning themselves, making oxygen all the time would remove their food. This means that plants would need to exist when animals, or something that takes oxygen and makes COwhatnot(CO two? can't remember) for the plants to breathe. This, in turn means that without the plants the animals who need oxygen would run out.

So now we have multiple factors that must be met in order for a species to even exist.
1. Multiples of said species numbering at least 2.
2. Plants and animals, or beings akin to them existing at the same time.
3. An ability to survive the harsh wilderness.
4. An ability to evolve into millions upon millions of different species.


So somehow all of these things were met, and that in turn is what caused life to exist upon this planet.

Well..am I the only person who finds that highly unbelievable? The chances of such an event occuring has to be nearly impossible.

Then you must also realize that not only does it require the multi-cellular makeup but also such things as organs and the like which work together to keep the person alive. This, in turn is nothing akin to the basic bacterial beings, so this evolution is a HUGE difference.